US determined to attack Iraq: report

Published January 17, 2003

NEW YORK, Jan 16: The United States could launch military action against Iraq even if UN weapons inspectors do not turn up any new evidence against Saddam Hussein, the New York Times reported on Thursday.

The Bush administration is also not heeding calls from other nations that it should seek explicit authorization to go to war from the UN Security Council, the paper added.

Three of the five permanent members of the Security Council — China, Russia and France — have said the issue should be discussed in the Security Council and an unambiguous and clear authorization for war should be given by the Council. Britain, the another permanent member, is not clear on its position although it is siding with the US on the issue so far.

Chief UN weapons inspector Hans Blix said on Thursday that he would tell Iraq the situation was “very tense and very dangerous” and only fuller cooperation with his team could avert the option of war.

Mr Hussein, a senior administration official, told the Times that the timetable for a decision about war would be “driven by events”.

Those include a report to be submitted by the United Nations weapons inspectors on Jan 27 and evidence that Mr Hussein is truly complying with the United Nations demand that he give up any weapons of mass destruction.

In another sign of the growing frustration with what the White House views as stalling and evasion by Iraq, the official said Mr Hussein was intimidating his scientists into refusing to travel outside Iraq for interviews about Baghdad’s weapons programmes. Iraq has said none of its scientists wanted to go outside the country for interviews.

“From that kind of regime, that’s called marching orders,” a US official told the paper.

Opinion

Respite needed

Respite needed

All one can fear is a familiar accounting exercise that aims to extract a few more rupees from a narrow, weary economic base.

Editorial

Soft on traders
08 Jun, 2026

Soft on traders

THE Fixed Tax Asaan Scheme for traders with an annual turnover of up to Rs200m has been designed as a ‘pragmatic...
Ceasefire in name
Updated 08 Jun, 2026

Ceasefire in name

Both sides accuse the other of violating the truce that was supposed to halt the conflict in April, yet neither appears willing to abandon negotiations altogether.
Damaged childhoods
08 Jun, 2026

Damaged childhoods

CHILD abuse is so prevalent that the UN ranked Pakistan as the least safe country for children. Even so, more than...
JAAC ban
Updated 07 Jun, 2026

JAAC ban

Though the JAAC’s demands are open to scrutiny, banning any political organisation — as long as it remains committed to peaceful activism — is undemocratic.
GB election
Updated 07 Jun, 2026

GB election

It is important that whichever party ultimately forms the government puts the needs of the people of GB above everything else.
ODI win
07 Jun, 2026

ODI win

AT last, the Pakistan cricket team had something to celebrate: a One-day International series victory against...