PESHAWAR, Dec 22: The accused in narcotics cases are placed in disadvantaged position because of non-calculation of percentage of banned ingredients in seized consignments.

Despite the passage of more than five years, the government has not framed the rules under the Control of Narcotics Substance Act, 1997, for calculating percentage in preparation of a drug, which has created many legal complications.

Under Section 3 of the act, it is binding on the government to make rules prescribing the methods by which percentage in the case of  liquid preparations should be calculated in narcotic drugs, including opium, cocaine and coca derivatives.

The law provides that if a person is arrested for possessing heroin, the investigation agency has to calculate percentage of different ingredients and the accused should be punished for the quantity of banned ingredients, which is calculated by analysts notified by the government.

As the investigation agencies have not been calculating the percentage, the accused are convicted for the entire consignment.

A lawyer said that under Section 35 of the act, the federal or provincial government could appoint the analysts.

The proviso to Section 3 of the act stated that till rules were framed, the percentage should be calculated on the basis that a preparation containing one per cent of a substance meant a preparation in which one gram of the substance was available.

The chairman of the free legal aid cell of the Voice  of  Prisoners, Noor Alam Khan, told Dawn that Section 3 was a mandatory provision of the act and the authorities should no longer delay the formulation of rules for calculating the percentage.

He said that under the act, the government had enhanced penalties done away with different provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code, which were in favour of the accused, like that of association of independent witnesses during recovery of contraband.

The government had to strictly follow the provisions of the act from which an accused could get little help, he said.

He said if it was claimed that charas was confiscated and on analysis it was found that two or three per cent of the banned ingredients were present in the stuff, the accused would be punished for that percentage and not for the entire quantity.

Opinion

Editorial

Doctor attacked
09 Jun, 2026

Doctor attacked

AN act of reprehensible violence has shaken the medical community. On Saturday, an employee of the Provincial Civil...
AJK flare-up
Updated 09 Jun, 2026

AJK flare-up

The situation started deteriorating after a trader affiliated with the JAAC was reportedly shot in an altercation with law-enforcers.
Fault lines
09 Jun, 2026

Fault lines

THE April 8 ceasefire that halted hostilities between Israel and Iran has encountered its most serious test yet....
Soft on traders
08 Jun, 2026

Soft on traders

THE Fixed Tax Asaan Scheme for traders with an annual turnover of up to Rs200m has been designed as a ‘pragmatic...
Ceasefire in name
Updated 08 Jun, 2026

Ceasefire in name

Both sides accuse the other of violating the truce that was supposed to halt the conflict in April, yet neither appears willing to abandon negotiations altogether.
Damaged childhoods
08 Jun, 2026

Damaged childhoods

CHILD abuse is so prevalent that the UN ranked Pakistan as the least safe country for children. Even so, more than...