LONDON: America’s nuclear weapons laboratories have begun preparations to test a new generation of arms after strong signs that the Bush administration may be about to pull out of the landmark Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty.

Amid renewed evidence that pro-nuclear hawks are increasingly holding sway, the Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration is increasing funding for nuclear weapons research and testing programmes. The funding would allow the US to be ready to return to underground tests within 12 months — a requirement of the US Nuclear Posture Review, which was unveiled by the Bush administration this year.

Although key figures are still engaged in a bitter debate over whether the US should withdraw from the treaty, Washington’s position on nuclear weapons development and use is increasingly hardline.

It culminated last month in the disclosure by the White House that a ‘pre-emptive strike policy’ — including first use of nuclear weapons against the chemical and biological facilities of even non-nuclear states deemed to pose a threat to the US — would be incorporated into the National Security Strategy from this autumn.

Although the US is a signatory of the treaty, it has never ratified it. George Bush (senior) decided instead to announce a US moratorium on weapons testing in 1992.

Since the launch of the Nuclear Posture Review last January, officials have been ambiguous about whether the US intends to return to testing, preferring to say that the Bush administration does not intend to end the moratorium ‘at this point’.

However, fresh concerns over intentions on nuclear weapons research and testing will be ignited with the publication of a report into US nuclear weapons policy by the British-American Security Information Council (Basic).

According to its author, Mark Bromley, plans for new US nuclear weapons threaten decades of work towards eradicating the nuclear threat.

Among the most prominent nuclear proponents is John Bolton, Under Secretary of State for Arms Control at the State Department, who campaigned successfully for the US to withdraw from the treaty to establish an International Criminal Court and has been campaigning with equal vigour for the US to withdraw from the Test Ban Treaty.

Although overruled by Secretary of State Colin Powell, senior officials say the debate is far from over. —Dawn/The Guardian News Service.

Opinion

Respite needed

Respite needed

All one can fear is a familiar accounting exercise that aims to extract a few more rupees from a narrow, weary economic base.

Editorial

Soft on traders
08 Jun, 2026

Soft on traders

THE Fixed Tax Asaan Scheme for traders with an annual turnover of up to Rs200m has been designed as a ‘pragmatic...
Ceasefire in name
Updated 08 Jun, 2026

Ceasefire in name

Both sides accuse the other of violating the truce that was supposed to halt the conflict in April, yet neither appears willing to abandon negotiations altogether.
Damaged childhoods
08 Jun, 2026

Damaged childhoods

CHILD abuse is so prevalent that the UN ranked Pakistan as the least safe country for children. Even so, more than...
JAAC ban
Updated 07 Jun, 2026

JAAC ban

Though the JAAC’s demands are open to scrutiny, banning any political organisation — as long as it remains committed to peaceful activism — is undemocratic.
GB election
Updated 07 Jun, 2026

GB election

It is important that whichever party ultimately forms the government puts the needs of the people of GB above everything else.
ODI win
07 Jun, 2026

ODI win

AT last, the Pakistan cricket team had something to celebrate: a One-day International series victory against...