PESHAWAR, March 19: A two-member bench of the Peshawar High Court on Tuesday sought comments from the NWFP government in reply to a writ petition challenging the ban on the private practice by government doctors and the introduction of institutional-based practice by the government.

The bench, comprising Justice Khalida Rachied and Justice Abdur Rauf Lughmani, took up for preliminary hearing the petition filed on behalf of the teachers’ associations of all the medical colleges and the Post-Graduate Medical Institution (PGMI) in the province.

The petitioners are: Khyber Medical College’s Teachers Association President Dr Siddiqur Rehman, General-Secretary Dr Ijaz Khattak, PGMI Teachers Association President Dr Arshid Jawed and General-Secretary Dr Jalil Khan.  

They claimed that they represented all the teachers of Khyber Medical College, Ayub Medical College, Saidu Medical College, Gomal Medical College, the PGMI and Lady Reading Hospital.

The petitioners’ counsel, Qazi Muhammad Anwer, contended that the notification, the provincial government had issued on Feb 12 to ban the private practice by the doctors, was based on mala fide intentions.

He argued that keeping in view the standard and capacity of the government hospitals, it would be difficult for the hospitals to cater to the needs of those patients who sought treatment from private doctors.

He remarked that it would be a great injustice with the poor patients, as preference would be given to the private patients, who visited those hospitals. “The major objective of the government is revenue generation through institutional-based practice,” he maintained.

The bench observed that doctors were government servants and all the rules and regulations applicable to other servants were also applicable to them.

The bench asked what would happen if like the doctors, the government servants of other departments started doing private practice after performing their official duties.

The petition named the respondents as the NWFP chief secretary, the health secretary, the federal government to be represented by the federal health secretary, the provincial health services director-general, the health services director of Fata, the chief executives of Hayatabad Medical Complex, Lady Reading Hospital and Khyber Teaching Hospital, all the districts Nazims in the province, all the executive district officers, health and all the medical superintendents.

The bench dismissed another petition, filed by Advocate Moazam Butt on behalf of an organization, Ideological Force of Pakistan, challenging the ban on the private practice by the doctors.

The bench observed that the petitioner was not an aggrieved party and it had no locus standi to file the petition.

Opinion

Editorial

Doctor attacked
09 Jun, 2026

Doctor attacked

AN act of reprehensible violence has shaken the medical community. On Saturday, an employee of the Provincial Civil...
AJK flare-up
09 Jun, 2026

AJK flare-up

MATTERS have worsened in the stand-off between the Azad Kashmir government and the Joint Awami Action Committee,...
Fault lines
09 Jun, 2026

Fault lines

THE April 8 ceasefire that halted hostilities between Israel and Iran has encountered its most serious test yet....
Soft on traders
08 Jun, 2026

Soft on traders

THE Fixed Tax Asaan Scheme for traders with an annual turnover of up to Rs200m has been designed as a ‘pragmatic...
Ceasefire in name
Updated 08 Jun, 2026

Ceasefire in name

Both sides accuse the other of violating the truce that was supposed to halt the conflict in April, yet neither appears willing to abandon negotiations altogether.
Damaged childhoods
08 Jun, 2026

Damaged childhoods

CHILD abuse is so prevalent that the UN ranked Pakistan as the least safe country for children. Even so, more than...