Low Graphics Site
White bar
Daily SectionMarker

Misc SectionMarker

Horoscope Recipes Weekly SectionMarker

Weekly SectionMarker

Pakistan's Internet Magazine
Herald
Dawn GroupMarker

Archive, Search, Feedback & HelpMarker

Dawn Classified



FrontPage National International Local Business KSE Forex Sports Editorial Opinion Letters Features Today's Cartoon TV Guide Cowasjee Ayaz Irfan Hussain Review Dawn Magazine Young World Images Dawn Group Subscription To Advertise

DINA
Previous Story DAWN - the Internet Edition Next Story


November 2, 2001 Friday Shaba’an 15, 1422

DAWN.com
Please Visit our Sponsor (Ads open in separate window)



SC issues warrants against 8 accused: Hakim Said case



By Our Staff Reporter


ISLAMABAD, Nov 1: The Supreme Court on Thursday issued non-bailable warrants of eight accused in Hakim Said murder case, and directed the Sindh government to keep them in Central Jail Karachi till the decision of the apex court on the state appeals against their acquittal.

On the appeal of state through Advocate General Sindh in which it impugned Sindh High Court judgment of acquitting all the nine accused in Hakim Said murder case on the benefit of doubt, the SC bench granted leave to appeal with a view to scrutinizing the whole evidence in the case.

Those who would again go behind the bars, if released in the light of SHC judgment on May 31, 2001, are Muhammad Amirullah, Ezazul Hasan alias Wazir, Muhammad Zubair Hussain, Muhammad Asif, Nadeem Mota, Muhammad Faisal, Abu Imran Pasha and Mohammad Shakir.

The Advocate General Sindh, Raja Qureshi contended that all the accused were awarded death sentence by the trial court for the murder of Hakim Mohammad Said, Hakim Abdul Qadir and Wali Mohammad.

The AG Sindh stated that the prosecution case against respondents stood proved beyond any reasonable doubt in view of the confidence-inspiring ocular evidence furnished by the natural as well as injured witnesses.

The division bench of Sindh High Court, the AG stated, have misread the ocular evidence which had resulted in grave miscarriage of justice. He emphasised that SHC had not considered the material that was available rendering the findings as “artificial, shocking and ridiculous.”

The SC bench, after hearing AG Sindh, held: “In the instant case, prima facie reading of the evidence shows overwhelming proof against the acquitted accused, disclosing misreading of evidence resulting into grave miscarriage of justice.”






Previous Story Top of Page Next Story

Seprater
Contributions
Privacy Policy
© DAWN Group of Newspapers, 2005