I couldn’t help but laugh at the first story I read in the newspaper this morning at my breakfast table. The headline, which read ‘Higher penalty for women’s harassment approved,’ indicated that the government had increased the fine and years of imprisonment for all those lecherous men out there. And, in fact, according to the Criminal Law (Amendment Bill),  the punishment for sexual harassment has been increased to three years' imprisonment (up from one year) and an 'unspecified fine' for a 'vague insult' to a woman.

As I read on, I realised that the bill  was aiming to do more than just dole out stricter punishments. It was about an amendment in the ‘definition’ of a Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) section which seeks to ‘reduce poverty’ by clamping down on offenders so that more women will be able to enter the job market without fear of sexual harassment.

If only it were that easy.

The story reminded me of my days as a trainee reporter – a journey I began on the public bus system. As I commuted from one end of the city to another to fetch a story, I had to be wary of a number of things, primarily the rampant harassment at the bus stop and inside buses.

I remember out of seats - all eight of them - allocated for women, who constitute 52 per cent of Pakistan’s population, I chose to sit only on the seat adjacent to the driver or on the single seat above the engine. The remaining four seats connected to the male compartment, and I would deliberately avoid those, even if they lay empty. Better to stand than fall victim to the prodding, touching (from any angle!), and brushing by male commuters.

Those women who have experienced the same tension boarding a bus may understand how humiliating those everyday rides were. Now that we have a clearer definition of harassment in the PPC section, I wonder if any woman will feel more optimistic about boarding a bus? Perhaps not.

We have seen how the Protection of Women (Criminal Laws Amendment) Act, 2006 – an ‘amended’ version of the discriminatory Hudood Ordinance - has not really made a difference to the life ordinary women because our police remain ill-trained and the dominant mentality of Pakistani society continues to discriminate against women.

No steps have been taken to raise awareness among the public about such laws and the individual rights that the constitution guarantees. Few Pakistanis know that they are doubly protected by international laws such as The Convention on the Elimination of all forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) that Pakistan is signatory to.

I am aware that the job of parliamentarians is to work on legislation and introduce it in the parliament, but in the case of this latest amendment, can they not call for an effective implementation instead of a tweaking of definitions and raising of fines? Or possibly talk of an amendment in other laws and rules relating to the law-enforcement agencies? I wonder why the police - who are charged with protecting the public, including women on buses, and enforcing the rule of law in everyday circumstances - are never questioned.

This brings me back to my argument of how practical is an amendment to the PPC that most lecherous men in public will probably never even hear about? And if they do, they couldn’t care less, because it's not as if anyone will ever stop them from misbehaving with women.

Yes, in the case of a workplace, the new specifications may help. But would it make the life of a working woman, who commutes using public transport to work every day, any different?

The bill does not define how offenders who engage in sexual harassment on the street and in public places  will be tried for this crime (since the police are hardly around when we need them the most). Also, what about those men who pinch you in public places and run away? Can the members from the treasury and opposition benches explain how we're going to hold such people accountable to the law in their ‘statement of objects and reasonings’ as well?

If not, they might as well make another amendment before it becomes an act: exclude ‘public’ and limit the amendment to ‘private and workplaces’ only. At least that way women have the hope of pursuing sexual harassers by utilising the mechanisms available to them in their offices. Without any regard for the practical implementation of such an amendment, it will remain ineffective.

Aroosa Masroor is a staff reporter for Dawn.com.

Opinion

Editorial

Impending slaughter
Updated 07 May, 2024

Impending slaughter

Seven months into the slaughter, there are no signs of hope.
Wheat investigation
07 May, 2024

Wheat investigation

THE Shehbaz Sharif government is in a sort of Catch-22 situation regarding the alleged wheat import scandal. It is...
Naila’s feat
07 May, 2024

Naila’s feat

IN an inspirational message from the base camp of Nepal’s Mount Makalu, Pakistani mountaineer Naila Kiani stressed...
Plugging the gap
06 May, 2024

Plugging the gap

IN Pakistan, bias begins at birth for the girl child as discriminatory norms, orthodox attitudes and poverty impede...
Terrains of dread
Updated 06 May, 2024

Terrains of dread

Restored faith in the police is unachievable without political commitment and interprovincial support.
Appointment rules
Updated 06 May, 2024

Appointment rules

If the judiciary had the power to self-regulate, it ought to have exercised it instead of involving the legislature.