THE registration of cases under the Anti-Terrorism Act against four newspapers by the Quetta police is unjustifiable. The newspapers were hauled up for publishing a statement by Jaish al-Islam, a banned organisation, in which the group claimed responsibility for the killing of a police officer. It goes without saying that the media must not glorify violence. But the glorification of terrorism is one thing; covering acts of terror, or statements claiming these, quite another. For instance, Al Qaeda supremo Ayman al-Zawahiri is among the world’s most wanted militants, but what he says and does is reported the world over. Similarly, giving coverage to the TTP’s brazen-faced threat of violence against political parties during the current election campaign makes eminent sense so that the public remains informed of the group’s intentions. And when the TTP made a so-called peace offer, the media reported not only the sham offer but the subsequent debate in parliament. More than a decade ago, the Musharraf regime banned many extremist parties, but that had little effect on their working. The bans proved ineffective for two reasons: first, the outlawed groups re-emerged under new names; second, the ban placed no restrictions on the activity of the personalities behind the groups. This ensured the continuity of the parties’ leadership. Currently, many such personalities are taking part in next month’s election and the media has no choice but to bring this to the notice of the people.

Meanwhile, threatened by the militants on the one hand and hounded mercilessly by the security agencies on the other, the media in Balochistan is facing severe restrictions in its attempt to present a factual and unbiased view of the growing menace of militancy in the province. With militants — Islamists and nationalists — issuing threats to the media and actively hampering the distribution of newspapers in certain areas, it is up to the government and the mainstream Baloch national parties to provide a secure environment to journalists instead of further deterring them from their job.

Opinion

Merging for what?

Merging for what?

The concern is that if the government is thinking of cutting costs through the merger, we might even lose the functionality levels we currently have.

Editorial

Dubai properties
Updated 16 May, 2024

Dubai properties

It is hoped that any investigation that is conducted will be fair and that no wrongdoing will be excused.
In good faith
16 May, 2024

In good faith

THE ‘P’ in PTI might as well stand for perplexing. After a constant yo-yoing around holding talks, the PTI has...
CTDs’ shortcomings
16 May, 2024

CTDs’ shortcomings

WHILE threats from terrorist groups need to be countered on the battlefield through military means, long-term ...
Reserved seats
Updated 15 May, 2024

Reserved seats

The ECP's decisions and actions clearly need to be reviewed in light of the country’s laws.
Secretive state
15 May, 2024

Secretive state

THERE is a fresh push by the state to stamp out all criticism by using the alibi of protecting national interests....
Plague of rape
15 May, 2024

Plague of rape

FLAWED narratives about women — from being weak and vulnerable to provocative and culpable — have led to...