mohammad amir, mohammad aamir, spot-fixing scandal, match-fixing
-File photo

LAHORE: Banned Pakistan speedster Mohammad Amir is hoping for a return to international cricket but admits he hasn’t forgotten the infamous spot-fixing scandal which led to his ouster.

“I haven’t forgotten that but I want to learn from that so as to avoid any such incident in future,” Amir told reporters at the Punjab Stadium where he was attending a sports festival of a private college as chief guest.

Amir was convicted along with captain Salman Butt, fellow fast bowler Mohammed Asif and agent Mazhar Majeed of a plot to bowl pre-determined no-balls against England at the Lord’s in August 2010 and is serving a five-year ICC ban for his role in the scandal.

Amir denied that he was in any contact with the ICC to get his suspension waived off citing it was “his personal matter” but admitted he “is missing cricket”.

Nevertheless, he hailed the performance of Junaid Khan and Mohammad Irfan on Pakistan’s recently-concluded tour of India.

“They bowled well in a high pressure series against India but in order to maintain their performances they have to consistently work hard,” he said.

Opinion

Editorial

Impending slaughter
Updated 07 May, 2024

Impending slaughter

Seven months into the slaughter, there are no signs of hope.
Wheat investigation
07 May, 2024

Wheat investigation

THE Shehbaz Sharif government is in a sort of Catch-22 situation regarding the alleged wheat import scandal. It is...
Naila’s feat
07 May, 2024

Naila’s feat

IN an inspirational message from the base camp of Nepal’s Mount Makalu, Pakistani mountaineer Naila Kiani stressed...
Plugging the gap
06 May, 2024

Plugging the gap

IN Pakistan, bias begins at birth for the girl child as discriminatory norms, orthodox attitudes and poverty impede...
Terrains of dread
Updated 06 May, 2024

Terrains of dread

Restored faith in the police is unachievable without political commitment and interprovincial support.
Appointment rules
Updated 06 May, 2024

Appointment rules

If the judiciary had the power to self-regulate, it ought to have exercised it instead of involving the legislature.