Prime Minister Raja Pervez Ashraf and PML-N chief Nawaz Sharif. – File Photo

ISLAMABAD: Prime Minister Raja Pervez Ashraf on Friday telephoned Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) chief Nawaz Sharif and discussed the political situation prevailing in the country.

Both the leaders agreed that democracy was the way forward and vowed to defy any attempt to derail the democratic process in the country.

Speaking to the prime minister, Nawaz Sharif said that Pakistan had lived with the horrors of so-called slogans of revolutions and long marches, adding the best way to ascertain the people's wishes was through ballot.

The premier said democracy was restored through struggle of political forces in the country and the system needed continuity to evolve.

He said that it was a sign of political maturity that all the political forces were on the same page as far as need for continuity of democratic process was concerned.

Prime Minister Ashraf reiterated that the government was committed to hold fair, free and transparent elections in the country as per the Constitution.

He assured Nawaz Sharif that all necessary steps would be taken to achieve this objective.

Opinion

Editorial

Impending slaughter
Updated 07 May, 2024

Impending slaughter

Seven months into the slaughter, there are no signs of hope.
Wheat investigation
07 May, 2024

Wheat investigation

THE Shehbaz Sharif government is in a sort of Catch-22 situation regarding the alleged wheat import scandal. It is...
Naila’s feat
07 May, 2024

Naila’s feat

IN an inspirational message from the base camp of Nepal’s Mount Makalu, Pakistani mountaineer Naila Kiani stressed...
Plugging the gap
06 May, 2024

Plugging the gap

IN Pakistan, bias begins at birth for the girl child as discriminatory norms, orthodox attitudes and poverty impede...
Terrains of dread
Updated 06 May, 2024

Terrains of dread

Restored faith in the police is unachievable without political commitment and interprovincial support.
Appointment rules
Updated 06 May, 2024

Appointment rules

If the judiciary had the power to self-regulate, it ought to have exercised it instead of involving the legislature.