Judge Nizamul Huq presides over the International Crimes Tribunal (ICT), which was created in 2010 to try war crimes suspects. The tribunal has been widely criticised as being a political tool for the ruling Awami League government to target its opponents.—AP Photo

DHAKA: Leaders from the Bangladeshi opposition Jamaat-e-Islami party demanded a retrial Monday for war crimes, including genocide, saying a leaked transcript of phone calls showed the trial judge had come under pressure to deliver a quick verdict.

Lawyers representing Motiur Rahman Nizami, who is head of the Jamaat-e-Islami party, Ghulam Azam and Delawar Hossain Sayedee had filed petitions before a court in Dhaka, defence lawyer Tanvir Ahmed said.

“The court started hearing two petitions today,” he told AFP.

Eleven suspects who are either members of Jamaat and or the main opposition Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) are accused of committing crimes such as murder, rape and religious persecution during the 1971 war against Pakistan.

Both Jamaat and BNP have called the trial process, which began in December 2010, “politically motivated”.

The push for a retrial comes after a pro-opposition daily published excerpts from a series of phone calls that the presiding judge held via Skype with a Brussels-based legal expert, prompting the judge to resign on December 11.

The excerpts showed that Nizamul Huq was not only under pressure from the government to deliver a quick verdict but that he also took advice from the expert on how to word the charges against the defendants.

In his demand for a retrial, another defence lawyer Moudud Ahmed said Huq’s comments had “contaminated the whole process”.

The court has since banned publication of the phone transcripts, parts of which are now available on YouTube. A prosecutor has also sued the editor of the newspaper, accusing him of sedition and cyber crimes.

Muslim-majority Bangladesh, which was formerly called East Pakistan, won its independence from then-West Pakistan after a nine-month long struggle in 1971.

The current government claims up to three million people were killed in the war, many murdered by locals collaborating with Pakistani forces. Pakistan has disputed the allegations.

Opinion

Merging for what?

Merging for what?

The concern is that if the government is thinking of cutting costs through the merger, we might even lose the functionality levels we currently have.

Editorial

Dubai properties
Updated 16 May, 2024

Dubai properties

It is hoped that any investigation that is conducted will be fair and that no wrongdoing will be excused.
In good faith
16 May, 2024

In good faith

THE ‘P’ in PTI might as well stand for perplexing. After a constant yo-yoing around holding talks, the PTI has...
CTDs’ shortcomings
16 May, 2024

CTDs’ shortcomings

WHILE threats from terrorist groups need to be countered on the battlefield through military means, long-term ...
Reserved seats
Updated 15 May, 2024

Reserved seats

The ECP's decisions and actions clearly need to be reviewed in light of the country’s laws.
Secretive state
15 May, 2024

Secretive state

THERE is a fresh push by the state to stamp out all criticism by using the alibi of protecting national interests....
Plague of rape
15 May, 2024

Plague of rape

FLAWED narratives about women — from being weak and vulnerable to provocative and culpable — have led to...