Nato convoys

Published August 8, 2012

WHILE the overland route for Nato convoys transporting supplies to Afghanistan through this country may have reopened last month after a seven-month closure, security of the convoys clearly remains an issue. On Monday an Afghan driver — part of such a convoy — was shot dead by suspected militants in Khyber Agency’s Jamrud Tehsil on the Peshawar-Torkham highway. This is reportedly the second attack in the area since the route reopened; the first occurred on July 24 in which a similar modus operandi was used by the attackers. Assailants on motorbikes ambushed the convoy, killing a driver. The shadowy Abdullah Azzam Brigade has claimed responsibility for Monday’s attack. Before the closure of the route convoys had also come under attack. But while previously vehicles were targeted by, for example, rockets fired at the containers, the past couple of incidents suggest a conscious effort is being made to kill or intimidate the drivers.

The main issue appears to be a lack of coordination between the different law-enforcement agencies active in the area. While police are responsible for law enforcement in the settled areas, khasadars and the Frontier Corps handle security in the tribal regions. It has been noted by some that the FC does not appear to be cooperating with the khasadars, while it is also true that the khasadars, made up of tribal recruits, don’t have the intelligence capabilities or resources to thwart militant attacks. Khasadars reportedly tried, and failed, to pursue the attackers in the latest ambush. Another view is that since the khasadars are local tribesmen, they may be reluctant about taking on the Taliban. In such a scenario, the FC should take the lead in providing security to the convoys in their journeys to and from Afghanistan. While the goods may be insured, the drivers have to pay with their lives. An effective, well-thought-out security plan is essential for the protection of the convoys and their drivers transiting through Torkham and Chaman, especially when the local Taliban have made it clear they will not spare them.

Opinion

Merging for what?

Merging for what?

The concern is that if the government is thinking of cutting costs through the merger, we might even lose the functionality levels we currently have.

Editorial

Dubai properties
Updated 16 May, 2024

Dubai properties

It is hoped that any investigation that is conducted will be fair and that no wrongdoing will be excused.
In good faith
16 May, 2024

In good faith

THE ‘P’ in PTI might as well stand for perplexing. After a constant yo-yoing around holding talks, the PTI has...
CTDs’ shortcomings
16 May, 2024

CTDs’ shortcomings

WHILE threats from terrorist groups need to be countered on the battlefield through military means, long-term ...
Reserved seats
Updated 15 May, 2024

Reserved seats

The ECP's decisions and actions clearly need to be reviewed in light of the country’s laws.
Secretive state
15 May, 2024

Secretive state

THERE is a fresh push by the state to stamp out all criticism by using the alibi of protecting national interests....
Plague of rape
15 May, 2024

Plague of rape

FLAWED narratives about women — from being weak and vulnerable to provocative and culpable — have led to...