MANSEHRA, Nov 15: Although Election Commission of Pakistan has set up separate polling booths for women to cast their votes in Kohistan by-election, yet it seems that people in most areas of the constituency will follow their tradition of not allowing womenfolk to take part in the balloting.

“We have established polling booths for women voters and are optimistic that they would come out to exercise their right of vote,” Deen Mohammad, the assistant election commissioner of Kohistan, told journalists on Tuesday.

He said that they had also asked the candidates to remove hurdles from their way and facilitate women to cast votes in the by-election to be held on Nov 24.

Kohistan is a conservative and backward district of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. During the previous elections including the general polls held in 2008, people of district didn't allow women to cast their votes.

Even the candidates for a national and three provincial assembly seats of district always opposed casting of votes by women. “This time too contenders are unwilling to allow women to cast votes in the by-election,” sources said.

The by-election will be held in PK-61 constituency for the provincial assembly seat, which fell vacant after the demise of MPA Maulana Obaidullah.

“People of Kohistan are against women taking part in polling and they would not allow their women to come to the polling booths and cast their votes,” said Sarfaraz Khan, a resident of the constituency.

He said that only those women, who were relatives and family members of the candidates, would go to the polling booths in urban areas of the constituency. Eleven contenders, from almost all mainstream parties, are in the run for by-election. A total of 84,675 voters, including 18,801 women, are registered in the constituency.

Deen Mohammad said that the candidates had assured him during a meeting that they would work to bring out the women on the polling day.

“I know that in the past women were not allowed to exercise their right of vote but this time situation will be different completely,” he said.

Opinion

Merging for what?

Merging for what?

The concern is that if the government is thinking of cutting costs through the merger, we might even lose the functionality levels we currently have.

Editorial

Dubai properties
Updated 16 May, 2024

Dubai properties

It is hoped that any investigation that is conducted will be fair and that no wrongdoing will be excused.
In good faith
16 May, 2024

In good faith

THE ‘P’ in PTI might as well stand for perplexing. After a constant yo-yoing around holding talks, the PTI has...
CTDs’ shortcomings
16 May, 2024

CTDs’ shortcomings

WHILE threats from terrorist groups need to be countered on the battlefield through military means, long-term ...
Reserved seats
Updated 15 May, 2024

Reserved seats

The ECP's decisions and actions clearly need to be reviewed in light of the country’s laws.
Secretive state
15 May, 2024

Secretive state

THERE is a fresh push by the state to stamp out all criticism by using the alibi of protecting national interests....
Plague of rape
15 May, 2024

Plague of rape

FLAWED narratives about women — from being weak and vulnerable to provocative and culpable — have led to...