Afghan President Hamid Karzai, center, inspects the honor guards before his prayers for the Eid al-Fitr that marks the end of the holy fasting month of Ramadan in Kabul, Afghanistan, Tuesday, Aug. 30, 2011.— AP Photo/Musadeq Sadeq

LONDON: A British minister accidentally revealed a sensitive government document on Afghanistan Tuesday which says London should welcome President Hamid Karzai's departure in 2014.

International Development Minister Andrew Mitchell inadvertently left the documents on display as he left Prime Minister David Cameron's Downing Street office and was photographed by waiting journalists.

The briefing notes say London should welcome Karzai's intention not to seek a third term as president.

“Note that Karzai has publicly stated his intention to step down at the end of his second term as per the constitution,” the document says.

“This is very important. It improves Afghanistan's political prospects very significantly. We should welcome Karzai's announcement in private and in public.” Karzai was controversially re-elected to a second term in 2009 in a poll dogged by controversy over vote fraud.

The British documents were marked “protected” but a spokesman for the Department for International Development insisted that they were of a “routine nature.” “They would have had a national security level marking of 'restricted' or 'confidential' if they contained anything of significant sensitivity,” he said.

Britain is the second-largest provider of troops to the international military effort fighting the Taliban in Afghanistan after the United States, with around 9,500 forces mainly in the south.

Mitchell is the latest high-profile figure in Britain to be photographed with sensitive files on display.

Police chief Bob Quick resigned as Britain's leading counter-terrorism officer in 2009 after accidentally displaying details of a secret operation to photographers.

Last November, Chief Secretary to the Treasury Danny Alexander, the second in charge at the finance ministry, was pictured with a copy of a government spending review document, revealing huge potential job losses in the public sector.

Opinion

Merging for what?

Merging for what?

The concern is that if the government is thinking of cutting costs through the merger, we might even lose the functionality levels we currently have.

Editorial

Dubai properties
Updated 16 May, 2024

Dubai properties

It is hoped that any investigation that is conducted will be fair and that no wrongdoing will be excused.
In good faith
16 May, 2024

In good faith

THE ‘P’ in PTI might as well stand for perplexing. After a constant yo-yoing around holding talks, the PTI has...
CTDs’ shortcomings
16 May, 2024

CTDs’ shortcomings

WHILE threats from terrorist groups need to be countered on the battlefield through military means, long-term ...
Reserved seats
Updated 15 May, 2024

Reserved seats

The ECP's decisions and actions clearly need to be reviewed in light of the country’s laws.
Secretive state
15 May, 2024

Secretive state

THERE is a fresh push by the state to stamp out all criticism by using the alibi of protecting national interests....
Plague of rape
15 May, 2024

Plague of rape

FLAWED narratives about women — from being weak and vulnerable to provocative and culpable — have led to...