Far-right plan

Published May 3, 2010

THE far-right British National Party would offer non-white British people £50,000 to leave “overcrowded” Britain and return to the land of their ancestors, the party's leader Nick Griffin has said.

Griffin said the voluntary programme would be open to around 180,000 people a year who “could go back and help develop their own countries”. He said the scheme would be funded from the foreign aid budget and money the government is “wasting at the moment on ridiculous climate change adaptation policies”.

“We're saying that we'd give resettlement grants ... this is voluntary ... we're looking probably at £50,000 per person,” he told BBC Radio 4's Today programme.

Griffin said that the doors would be closed to everyone because Britain was “the most overcrowded country in Europe”, but he did give exceptions. He said that Irish people would be allowed in because “as far as we are concerned the Irish are part of Britain and are fully entitled to come here”.

Griffin also gave the example of a Japanese physicist needed to help with a fleet of British-built nuclear power stations to be developed under a BNP government. He claimed that French people who came to the country were unlikely to be targeting “soft-touch Britain”.

“If you are talking about Polish plumbers or Afghan refugees, the doors are going to be shut because Britain is full,” the BNP leader said.

Griffin, who was “very pleased” to talk about immigration, continued “The door is shut to any significant numbers whatsoever, from anywhere. It's open where it suits Britain and suits the British people. That's fair enough.”

He claimed “British indigenous” people would be in a minority in the country between 2050 and the end of the century.

Griffin said the BNP would be prepared to tear up international treaties in order to achieve its objectives. Asked what would happen if other countries reciprocated by not allowing British people in, Griffin replied “The last thing I saw there wasn't a queue of Brits trying to go to Albania or Somalia.”

—The Guardian, London

Opinion

Merging for what?

Merging for what?

The concern is that if the government is thinking of cutting costs through the merger, we might even lose the functionality levels we currently have.

Editorial

Dubai properties
Updated 16 May, 2024

Dubai properties

It is hoped that any investigation that is conducted will be fair and that no wrongdoing will be excused.
In good faith
16 May, 2024

In good faith

THE ‘P’ in PTI might as well stand for perplexing. After a constant yo-yoing around holding talks, the PTI has...
CTDs’ shortcomings
16 May, 2024

CTDs’ shortcomings

WHILE threats from terrorist groups need to be countered on the battlefield through military means, long-term ...
Reserved seats
Updated 15 May, 2024

Reserved seats

The ECP's decisions and actions clearly need to be reviewed in light of the country’s laws.
Secretive state
15 May, 2024

Secretive state

THERE is a fresh push by the state to stamp out all criticism by using the alibi of protecting national interests....
Plague of rape
15 May, 2024

Plague of rape

FLAWED narratives about women — from being weak and vulnerable to provocative and culpable — have led to...