Oil gains on pending Iran-Oman Hormuz deal

Published Updated
0
Workers of Venezuelan state oil company PDVSA labour at an operating pumpjack in Cabimas, Venezuela, January 27, 2026 — Reuters/File
Workers of Venezuelan state oil company PDVSA labour at an operating pumpjack in Cabimas, Venezuela, January 27, 2026 — Reuters/File

HOUSTON: Oil prices gained on Friday as markets assessed a pending agreement between Iran and Oman that would set rules for transit of the Strait of Hormuz.

Brent crude futures were up 93 cents, or 1.14 per cent, at $83.42 a barrel at 1:14 p.m. CDT (1814 GMT). West Texas Inter­mediate futures rose 96 cents, or 1.24pc, to $78.25.

Oil futures had settled more than $3 a barrel higher on Thursday as Iran reviewed a bill to ban US and Israeli vessels from the Strait of Hormuz, through which roughly a fifth of the world’s oil and liquefied natural gas normally pas­sed before the war began at the end of February.

Oil prices fell earlier in the week as a possible solution to the conflict looked more likely, and both benchmarks are on course for a weekly loss of more than 9pc.

“The market is trying to assess if an Iran-Oman ag­­reement would allow a US-flagged vessel to transit the Strait of Hormuz,” said Andrew Lipow, president of Lipow Oil Associa­tes. “Would it allow a US-ow­­ned vessel to go through? Would it allow a vessel headed for a US port to go through?”

Both Iran and Oman are said to have agreed on the route ships would take through the strait betwe­en their two countries.

The oil market is also trying to determine how long it might take to end the 5-month-old war between the US, Israel and Iran, Lipow said.

“The longer the supply disruption goes, the longer the world’s commercial reserves are being drawn down,” he said.

Analysts also said that this week’s developments have signalled that hostilities between Iran and the US are not yet over.

Iran is seeking fees of between 5pc and 7pc of the price of cargoes from ships using the strait, a senior Ira­­nian official said. Oman, meanwhile, is discussing fees of about 3pc while Wa­­shington wants no fees at all.

Four industry sources have said the proposed deal is not easily workable because of US sanctions and restrictive insurance clauses on any payments.

Published in Dawn, August 8th, 2026

Follow Dawn Business on X, LinkedIn, Instagram and Facebook for insights on business, finance and tech from Pakistan and across the world.

Opinion

Editorial

Danger ahead
08 Aug, 2026

Danger ahead

PAKISTAN has already paid a heavy human price this monsoon, even as another dangerous spell approaches. NDMA figures...
Israeli impunity
08 Aug, 2026

Israeli impunity

ANY hope that Hamas’s decision to disarm would lead to a breakthrough has been dashed for one simple reason:...
Flawed investigations
08 Aug, 2026

Flawed investigations

THE botched case of a young Karachi businessman, Mir Raza Ali, who died under suspicious circumstances, took a new...
Terrorist havens
07 Aug, 2026

Terrorist havens

DESPITE the use of both carrots and sticks by the international community, the Afghan Taliban refuse to cut their...
Mineral wealth
Updated 07 Aug, 2026

Mineral wealth

Any future agreements involving critical minerals must be subjected to rigorous legal, financial and technical scrutiny.
Growth denied
07 Aug, 2026

Growth denied

THE Sindh government’s agreement with the World Bank to combine health, nutrition, sanitation, social protection...