Call for change

Published February 4, 2024

IN recent times, Pakistan has witnessed some encouraging signs of women’s political participation. For instance, Tharparkar district recorded an unprecedented 71pc female voter turnout in 2018, and women in Swabi are this time actively campaigning in traditionally male-dominated spaces. However, these positive strides contrast sharply with the still persistent gender disparity in election candidacies: out of 65,916 total candidates, only 3,235 (4.91pc) are women. This disproportionate representation is consistent across provinces, with Sindh leading marginally at 5.39pc and Balochistan trailing at a mere 3.14pc. Such disparity reflects deeper societal issues that limit women’s participation in politics. The PTI, despite losing its poll symbol, fielded 20 women for general seats out of 234 candidates, a small but significant step towards gender inclusivity. However, its candidates are now contesting independently, which may impact their visibility and support. Tribal customs hinder the campaign efforts of women candidates in several areas, such as KP’s Khyber district, restricting their outreach primarily to female voters.

This scenario underlines the urgent need for systemic change. Political parties must not only increase the number of women candidates but also create an environment conducive to their active participation. This includes challenging deep-rooted patriarchal norms and providing women with the resources and support necessary to run effective campaigns. Furthermore, women’s representation on general seats is crucial for genuine empowerment. While reserved seats are essential, they often do not provide the same level of influence and resources as general seats. Women elected on general seats have access to development funds and a more substantial say in legislative matters, directly impacting their constituencies. While there are glimmers of progress, much remains to be done. Our political landscape needs a transformative shift towards gender inclusivity. This is not just a matter of equitable representation but a fundamental requirement for a democratic and progressive society.

Published in Dawn, February 4th, 2024

Opinion

Merging for what?

Merging for what?

The concern is that if the government is thinking of cutting costs through the merger, we might even lose the functionality levels we currently have.

Editorial

Dubai properties
Updated 16 May, 2024

Dubai properties

It is hoped that any investigation that is conducted will be fair and that no wrongdoing will be excused.
In good faith
16 May, 2024

In good faith

THE ‘P’ in PTI might as well stand for perplexing. After a constant yo-yoing around holding talks, the PTI has...
CTDs’ shortcomings
16 May, 2024

CTDs’ shortcomings

WHILE threats from terrorist groups need to be countered on the battlefield through military means, long-term ...
Reserved seats
Updated 15 May, 2024

Reserved seats

The ECP's decisions and actions clearly need to be reviewed in light of the country’s laws.
Secretive state
15 May, 2024

Secretive state

THERE is a fresh push by the state to stamp out all criticism by using the alibi of protecting national interests....
Plague of rape
15 May, 2024

Plague of rape

FLAWED narratives about women — from being weak and vulnerable to provocative and culpable — have led to...