SC peeved by LHC ‘blanket bail’ orders for Parvez Elahi

Published
0

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court on Thursday took exception to the Lahore High Court’s tendency to grant “blanket bail orders”, and sought assistance on the legal sanctity attached to orders the barring arrest of an individual, even in cases that were not known at the time.

“Grant[ing] of such blanket orders is like issuing license to commit crimes,” observed Justice Sardar Tariq Masood while heading a three-judge Supreme Court bench that had taken up a challenge by Qaisara Elahi – the wife of former Punjab chief minister Pervez Elahi.

The petitioner had approached the Supreme Court to assail the Lahore High Court (LHC) order to dispose of a habeas corpus petition.

Before postponing for further hearing, the apex court asked senior counsel Sardar Latif Khosa to assist it by identifying the legal status of blind orders, even on unknown FIRs, and what the scope of such orders would be with regard to habeas corpus petitions.

“We are at a loss to understand what our high courts are doing,” regretted Justice Sardar Masood, adding that blanket bail orders were awarded even before the registration of the case.

Under what law are such blanket orders issued, Justice Sardar Masood asked, wondering if such orders could also prevent police from arresting an individual if they commit homicide, merely on the grounds that the high court had given them blanket bail with a direction not to arrest them in any other case.

The counsel regretted how his client was arrested the moment the high court granted him bail, saying that it was becoming a joke and Mr Elahi was being “picked up like a sack”.

Justice Musarrat Hilali, another member of the bench, wondered what law such blanket orders were being issued under. Instead of getting sentimental, the counsel should advance arguments on legal grounds, suggested Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah.

When the counsel equated the prevailing situation in the country with that of India-held Kashmir, Justice Masood suggested he not draw parallels with the occupied valley, which occupied by the Indian military.

The counsel also recalled how the Supreme Court had declared the arrest of PTI chief Imran Khan from within the premises of the high court illegal, saying that if the court considers the current case infructous, then it should dispose of it, saying that this should be considered the destiny of Pakistan.

Published in Dawn, October 6th, 2023

Opinion

Editorial

Kashmir unresolved
Updated 30 Sep, 2026

Kashmir unresolved

The just solution lies in India addressing the issue through a trilateral dialogue involving the legitimate representatives of the Kashmiri people and Pakistan.
Water shortage
30 Sep, 2026

Water shortage

THAT the country is entering the Rabi season with an anticipated water shortage of nearly 25pc, the lowest carryover...
Young hearts
30 Sep, 2026

Young hearts

THE observance may have passed, but the message of World Heart Day should not fade with it. The occasion is a useful...
Terror and politics
Updated 29 Sep, 2026

Terror and politics

There is an urgent need to tone down the rhetoric and tackle terrorism as a collective challenge for both the affected provinces and the federation.
Watching the glaciers
29 Sep, 2026

Watching the glaciers

THE latest signs from Pakistan’s mountains are worrying. Suparco says the number of unfrozen glacial lakes it...
Dangerous agenda
29 Sep, 2026

Dangerous agenda

AS the world remains fixated on the US-Iran conflict, elsewhere in the Middle East, Israel is consolidating its grip...