MOSCOW, Jan 31: President Vladimir Putin issued a thinly-veiled warning to Washington on Thursday against using strong-arm methods in international diplomacy while confirming that Moscow demanded nuclear arms cuts be enshrined in a formal treaty.

Putin’s tough message came amid signs that Moscow and Washington were making only limited progress in their ongoing negotiations over arms cuts and missile defence.

It also followed the firmest indication yet that US President George W. Bush was willing to strike against Russia’s Middle East ally Iraq after calling Baghdad a part of “an axis of evil” in his State of the Union address on Tuesday.

Receiving the credentials of new ambassadors to Russia, Putin described as hopeless a pattern of international relations “based on the domination of one center of force.”

Instead Putin said he favoured the creation of “a truly fair international system, based on law and respect for the interests of each state, and capable of ensuring equal security for all nations.”

Earlier, the Kremlin cited Putin as saying in a meeting with Russian Defence Minister Sergei Ivanov that he was dissatisfied with Washington’s current approach to arms cuts, which would see future cuts outlined in a looser, informal agreement.

Putin’s comments came one day after the Russian foreign ministry called for “a binding legal document” to be agreed by Washington and Moscow that would establish a ceiling of 1,700 to 2,200 nuclear warheads 10 years from now.

The disarmament issue has shaken warming relations between Moscow and Washington, with Putin calling “a mistake” Bush’s unilateral decision to withdraw from the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile treaty to pursue the development of a missile defence system.

The US on Wednesday declined to comment on Moscow’s demand for cuts within the context of a binding legal treaty saying only that it had held “productive” and “substantive” arms control talks this week with Russia. The talks are expected to resume in Moscow on Feb 19.

The fact that Russia has requested a binding treaty may further sour disarmament talks, as the United States has said it wants a more informal agreement.

The two sides are hopeful that the disarmament issue can be resolved before Bush makes an official visit to Russia in the middle of this year.—AFP

Opinion

Editorial

Doctor attacked
09 Jun, 2026

Doctor attacked

AN act of reprehensible violence has shaken the medical community. On Saturday, an employee of the Provincial Civil...
AJK flare-up
Updated 09 Jun, 2026

AJK flare-up

The situation started deteriorating after a trader affiliated with the JAAC was reportedly shot in an altercation with law-enforcers.
Fault lines
09 Jun, 2026

Fault lines

THE April 8 ceasefire that halted hostilities between Israel and Iran has encountered its most serious test yet....
Soft on traders
08 Jun, 2026

Soft on traders

THE Fixed Tax Asaan Scheme for traders with an annual turnover of up to Rs200m has been designed as a ‘pragmatic...
Ceasefire in name
Updated 08 Jun, 2026

Ceasefire in name

Both sides accuse the other of violating the truce that was supposed to halt the conflict in April, yet neither appears willing to abandon negotiations altogether.
Damaged childhoods
08 Jun, 2026

Damaged childhoods

CHILD abuse is so prevalent that the UN ranked Pakistan as the least safe country for children. Even so, more than...