KARACHI: A judicial magistrate has ordered registration of a case against three persons for allegedly subjecting a woman to domestic violence.

Judicial Magistrate (South) Waheed Ahmed took cognizance of the complaint lodged by the victim, a resident of Bihar Colony, under the relevant sections of the Domestic Violence (Prevention & Protection) Act, 2013.

He observed that after the filing of the instant complaint, the respondent, Ahmed Raza, had divorced her, which reflected his conduct towards her.

Therefore, the magistrate took cognizance of the offence under Section 5(b), (f), (g), (j) & (o) read with Section 6 of the Domestic Violence (Prevention & Protection) Act, 2013.

He also ordered registration of a case against the complainant’s husband Ahmed Raza, brother-in-law Abdul Munaf and mother-in-law Farida Siddique under the same sections of the Act.

The magistrate directed them to furnish a surety of Rs10,000 each and cautioned that in case of failure they would be taken into custody and remanded in jail custody.

Earlier, the victim’s counsel, Bahzad Akbar, stated that his client was residing with her husband and in-laws in a shared house since their marriage solemnised six years ago.

He alleged that soon after the marriage, she found out that her father-in-law was mentally unstable and wandered around the house stark naked, adding that he would also walk into her room and try to hug her, forcing her to lock herself in a bathroom.

He said that on complaining about this, her husband as well as in-laws not only used abusive language but also inflicted severe injuries on her. Fearing for her and her minor daughter’s safety, the complainant left the house of her husband and began residing again with her parents, added Advocate Akbar.

The complainant said her husband divorced her after she approached the court against them.

On the other hand, the counsel for the accused denied the allegations leveled against his clients. He alleged that the complainant had left the house of her husband without any plausible reason and filed a suit for conjugal rights.

Published in Dawn, September 30th, 2022

Opinion

Merging for what?

Merging for what?

The concern is that if the government is thinking of cutting costs through the merger, we might even lose the functionality levels we currently have.

Editorial

Dubai properties
Updated 16 May, 2024

Dubai properties

It is hoped that any investigation that is conducted will be fair and that no wrongdoing will be excused.
In good faith
16 May, 2024

In good faith

THE ‘P’ in PTI might as well stand for perplexing. After a constant yo-yoing around holding talks, the PTI has...
CTDs’ shortcomings
16 May, 2024

CTDs’ shortcomings

WHILE threats from terrorist groups need to be countered on the battlefield through military means, long-term ...
Reserved seats
Updated 15 May, 2024

Reserved seats

The ECP's decisions and actions clearly need to be reviewed in light of the country’s laws.
Secretive state
15 May, 2024

Secretive state

THERE is a fresh push by the state to stamp out all criticism by using the alibi of protecting national interests....
Plague of rape
15 May, 2024

Plague of rape

FLAWED narratives about women — from being weak and vulnerable to provocative and culpable — have led to...