Saba Qamar, Bilal Saeed acquitted in video shoot case at Wazir Khan mosque

Published May 9, 2022
Screengrab of actor Saba Qamar and singer Bilal Saeed from their music video for "Qubool hai". — DawnNewsTV screengrab/File
Screengrab of actor Saba Qamar and singer Bilal Saeed from their music video for "Qubool hai". — DawnNewsTV screengrab/File

A Lahore sessions court on Monday acquitted actor Saba Qamar and singer Bilal Saeed in a case concerning the alleged desecration of Wazir Khan mosque, ruling that the charges against them were "groundless".

Additional Sessions Judge Malik Muhammad Mushtaq set aside the order passed by a judicial magistrate on March 2, stating that it was "not sustainable in the eyes of the law" and accepted Qamar and Saeed's acquittal pleas.

In March, a judicial magistrate had dismissed their acquittal applications in the same case after which they had filed an appeal in the sessions court.

In an eight-page detailed verdict released today, a copy of which is available with Dawn.com, Judge Mushtaq said the investigating officer did not find any evidence to suggest that the two intentionally damaged, defiled or disrespected the place of worship.

"Rather, they being artists, joined the shooting with prior permission from the Auqaf department and religious affair[s] department, government of Punjab, Lahore," the verdict said.

Also read: Saba Qamar, Bilal Saeed indicted in desecration case

The judge added that the requisite fee was deposited before the recording took place at the mosque while the entire shoot occurred under the supervision of the department concerned and according to the terms and conditions of the license obtained from the Auqaf department.

"During the investigation of the case, no music player was taken into possession," the judge observed, adding that all the witnesses were not present at the alleged place of occurrence and had seen the clip on social media.

"So nothing has come on surface that [the] petitioners played any song at the place of worship, therefore, in my view the charge against the petitioners would be said as groundless, and when the charge would be groundless, there would be no need [for] the trial of the case," the judge said.

Qamar and Saeed became the centre of criticism in August 2020 after it emerged that they had shot footage inside the historic mosque while working on the video of a song.

Subsequently, Akbari Gate police had registered a case against the duo under Section 295 of the Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) following a court’s direction to act on an application filed by Advocate Sardar Farhat Manzoor Khan as per the law and decide whether a cognisable offence was made out.

The section deals with the offence of injuring or defiling a place of worship, with intent to insult the religion of any class. The complainant had contended that the duo trampled upon the sanctity of the mosque.

In October 2021, the duo was indicted in the case. However, they had pleaded not guilty and decided to contest the trial. Earlier this year in March, a judicial magistrate had dismissed the duo's acquittal pleas following which they had filed an appeal in the sessions court.

During the trial process, Qamar and Saeed had also apologised for the incident and issued explanations that shed further light on the video shoot's context.

Opinion

Editorial

Impending slaughter
Updated 07 May, 2024

Impending slaughter

Seven months into the slaughter, there are no signs of hope.
Wheat investigation
07 May, 2024

Wheat investigation

THE Shehbaz Sharif government is in a sort of Catch-22 situation regarding the alleged wheat import scandal. It is...
Naila’s feat
07 May, 2024

Naila’s feat

IN an inspirational message from the base camp of Nepal’s Mount Makalu, Pakistani mountaineer Naila Kiani stressed...
Plugging the gap
06 May, 2024

Plugging the gap

IN Pakistan, bias begins at birth for the girl child as discriminatory norms, orthodox attitudes and poverty impede...
Terrains of dread
Updated 06 May, 2024

Terrains of dread

Restored faith in the police is unachievable without political commitment and interprovincial support.
Appointment rules
Updated 06 May, 2024

Appointment rules

If the judiciary had the power to self-regulate, it ought to have exercised it instead of involving the legislature.