Member calls for PBC meeting to discuss govt’s second review plea

Published June 1, 2021
This file photo shows Justice Qazi Faez Isa. — Photo courtesy Supreme Court website
This file photo shows Justice Qazi Faez Isa. — Photo courtesy Supreme Court website

ISLAMABAD: A senior member of the Pakistan Bar Council (PBC) from Balochistan Munir Ahmad Khan Kakar on Monday proposed convening of a meeting of the council to take stock of the federal government’s move to file a curative second review petition in the Justice Qazi Faez Isa judgment.

On May 26, the federal government filed a set of review petitions under the curative review petition against the April 26, 2021, order of the majority in the review petitions of Justice Qazi Faez Isa, a sitting judge of the Supreme Court who recently won a case in his favour that too on a review petition.

These petitions however were returned by the registrar office of the Supreme Court on the grounds that a second review petition cannot be filed to challenge a decision that was already announced on a review petition besides the language used by the government was scandalous.

In a letter to PBC Vice Chairman Khushdin Khan, Mr Kakar stated that the government’s move and act to file the curative review petition to challenge the review judgement was based on ulterior motives.

Mr Kakar regretted that the government’s attempt was apparently aimed at targeting and suppressing independence of the judiciary, adding hateful content was being used against lawyers on social media, including a propaganda against the judiciary, besides attacks against an independent media.

The member suggested convening of a PBC meeting to consider government’s intention to file the second review. He also called for the All Pakistan Lawyers Representative Convention as early as possible.

Meanwhile, Mr Khan and chairman of PBC’s Executive Committee Mohammad Faheem Wali also condemned the imposition of restrictions and attempts to curtail freedom of expression and digital rights of citizens by taking off air the famous talk-show of senior and renowned journalist, Hamid Mir.

They expressed their deep concerns and rejected government’s undemocratic move to ban a senior journalist by taking him off air, the same being based on ulterior motives, to suppress the voice of an independent journalist. It is a violation of his constitutional right as enshrined in Article 19 of the Constitution, they added. They urged the government to take immediate steps to withdraw the ban on Mr Mir. They also criticised such blatant attempts to intimidate those who work towards upholding the rule of law.

They said the legal fraternity will always stand with independent media against all sorts of visible, candid and hidden aggression and will never tolerate any intimidation to curb their independent voice.

Published in Dawn, June 1st, 2021

Opinion

Editorial

Reserved seats
Updated 15 May, 2024

Reserved seats

The ECP's decisions and actions clearly need to be reviewed in light of the country’s laws.
Secretive state
15 May, 2024

Secretive state

THERE is a fresh push by the state to stamp out all criticism by using the alibi of protecting national interests....
Plague of rape
15 May, 2024

Plague of rape

FLAWED narratives about women — from being weak and vulnerable to provocative and culpable — have led to...
Privatisation divide
Updated 14 May, 2024

Privatisation divide

How this disagreement within the government will sit with the IMF is anybody’s guess.
AJK protests
14 May, 2024

AJK protests

SINCE last week, Azad Jammu & Kashmir has been roiled by protests, fuelled principally by a disconnect between...
Guns and guards
14 May, 2024

Guns and guards

THERE are some flawed aspects to our society that we must start to fix at the grassroots level. One of these is the...