Case to be lodged against JUI-F's Mufti Kifayatullah for 'speaking against army': Sheikh Rashid

Published December 29, 2020
Interior Minister Sheikh Rashid has announced the filing of a case against JUI-F leader  Mufti Kifayatullah. —  DawnNews/TV
Interior Minister Sheikh Rashid has announced the filing of a case against JUI-F leader Mufti Kifayatullah. — DawnNews/TV

Federal Minister for Interior Sheikh Rashid Ahmed on Tuesday said a case will be registered against Jamiat Ulema-i-Islam-Fazl (JUI-F) leader Mufti Kifayatullah for "speaking against" the Pakistan Army, saying his invective was not tolerable.

The minister was apparently referring to recent comments made by Kifayatullah during a TV talk show, in which he said "generals too should be held accountable for their theft".

"It has been decided to lodge a case against Mufti Kifayatullah in Lahore," Rashid told 24 News HD. "The language he used against our great army which has given countless sacrifices is not acceptable."

While talking to Geo News, he said action will be taken according to the Constitution and law against whoever "uses abusive language" against the armed forces.

At a post-cabinet meeting press conference in Islamabad, Information Minister Shibli Faraz too condemned Kifayatullah's remarks as "shameful", saying he appeared to be advancing India's agenda.

Faraz said leaders of the opposition Pakistan Democratic Movement (PDM) were saying things at their rallies that were similar to the Indian propaganda campaign against Pakistan.

Information Minister Shibli Faraz addresses a press conference. — DawnNewsTV
Information Minister Shibli Faraz addresses a press conference. — DawnNewsTV

He noted that the EU DisinfoLab had recently uncovered an Indian disinformation network operating to discredit Pakistan, target its economy and the armed forces, and spread terrorism and chaos in the country.

"The kind of disinformation campaign started by India, we are seeing similar things are being said from the platform of the PDM, whether they are in the form of Nawaz Sharif, Maryam Nawaz of Mufti Kifayatullah," Faraz said.

"This was a very organised campaign aimed at maligning the state of Pakistan, weakening the country and creating chaos whose replay or actual version we are seeing in the form of PDM."

The minister said the government had taken "strict notice" of such statements and was also "monitoring" the situation, adding that the developments were not taking place in isolation.

"We are getting reports on everything such as who is linked to Hussain Haqqani [and] who is advising whom," he told the media.

Terming Kifayatullah's remarks as "shameful", Faraz said the JUI-F leader through his comments was only pleasing the "enemy" because whatever was said in Pakistan was run as "breaking news" on India TV channels in a matter of moments.

"Willingly or unwillingly, you have become a facilitator of the actions of India which is our arch-enemy," he said.

Citing the decision of a group led by Maulana Mohammad Khan Sherani to separate themselves from JUI-F leader Maulana Fazlur Rehman, Faraz said the PDM itself was suffering from divisions and so there was no chance of it succeeding to send the government home.

Opinion

Editorial

Impending slaughter
Updated 07 May, 2024

Impending slaughter

Seven months into the slaughter, there are no signs of hope.
Wheat investigation
07 May, 2024

Wheat investigation

THE Shehbaz Sharif government is in a sort of Catch-22 situation regarding the alleged wheat import scandal. It is...
Naila’s feat
07 May, 2024

Naila’s feat

IN an inspirational message from the base camp of Nepal’s Mount Makalu, Pakistani mountaineer Naila Kiani stressed...
Plugging the gap
06 May, 2024

Plugging the gap

IN Pakistan, bias begins at birth for the girl child as discriminatory norms, orthodox attitudes and poverty impede...
Terrains of dread
Updated 06 May, 2024

Terrains of dread

Restored faith in the police is unachievable without political commitment and interprovincial support.
Appointment rules
Updated 06 May, 2024

Appointment rules

If the judiciary had the power to self-regulate, it ought to have exercised it instead of involving the legislature.