EU backs ICC after US revokes visa of its prosecutor

Published April 7, 2019
A spokesperson for the EU’s diplomatic service said the bloc “fully supports the ICC and its independence” and said Brussels expected the US to comply with its “international obligations” toward the court. ─ AP/File
A spokesperson for the EU’s diplomatic service said the bloc “fully supports the ICC and its independence” and said Brussels expected the US to comply with its “international obligations” toward the court. ─ AP/File

BRUSSELS: The Euro­pean Union on Saturday declared its support for the International Criminal Court (ICC), voicing “serious concern” after the US revoked the chief prosecutor’s visa over a possible investigation into American soldiers’ actions in Afghanistan.

Prosecutor Fatou Ben-so­uda’s office confirmed on Friday that Washington had revoked her visa for entry into the US — a move that came after US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo announced restrictions on ICC staff who probed US or allied personnel.

A spokesperson for the EU’s diplomatic service said the bloc “fully supports the ICC and its independence” and said Brussels expected the US to comply with its “international obligations” toward the court.

“The European Union reiterates its serious concern about the US policy toward the ICC,” the spokesperson said in a statement.

“The ICC plays a key role in the fight against impunity.

“The EU emphasises that protecting the neutrality and judicial independence of the ICC is paramount to its effectiveness and proper functioning.”

Bensouda asked ICC judges in November 2017 for authorisation to open an investigation into alleged war crimes in Afghanistan by the Taliban, Afghan government forces and international forces including US troops.

The court has not yet decided whether to launch a full-blown probe.

The US has never joined the ICC and does not recognise its authority over American citizens, saying it poses a threat to national sovereignty.

Washington also argues that it has its own robust procedures in place to deal with US troops who engage in misconduct.

Published in Dawn, April 7th, 2019

Opinion

Merging for what?

Merging for what?

The concern is that if the government is thinking of cutting costs through the merger, we might even lose the functionality levels we currently have.

Editorial

Dubai properties
Updated 16 May, 2024

Dubai properties

It is hoped that any investigation that is conducted will be fair and that no wrongdoing will be excused.
In good faith
16 May, 2024

In good faith

THE ‘P’ in PTI might as well stand for perplexing. After a constant yo-yoing around holding talks, the PTI has...
CTDs’ shortcomings
16 May, 2024

CTDs’ shortcomings

WHILE threats from terrorist groups need to be countered on the battlefield through military means, long-term ...
Reserved seats
Updated 15 May, 2024

Reserved seats

The ECP's decisions and actions clearly need to be reviewed in light of the country’s laws.
Secretive state
15 May, 2024

Secretive state

THERE is a fresh push by the state to stamp out all criticism by using the alibi of protecting national interests....
Plague of rape
15 May, 2024

Plague of rape

FLAWED narratives about women — from being weak and vulnerable to provocative and culpable — have led to...