Bilawal regrets being called 'anti-state' for criticising PTI ministers

Published March 19, 2019
In a post shared on Twitter, Bilawal wrote: "The government has responded to my demand to sack ministers associated with banned outfits by declaring me anti-state, issuing death threats and NAB notices." — DawnNewsTV/File
In a post shared on Twitter, Bilawal wrote: "The government has responded to my demand to sack ministers associated with banned outfits by declaring me anti-state, issuing death threats and NAB notices." — DawnNewsTV/File

Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) chairman Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari on Tuesday said the government had responded to his demand to remove ministers whom he had accused of being associated with banned outfits by declaring him to be "anti-state, issuing death threats, and [National Accountability Bureau] NAB notices".

In a post shared on Twitter, Bilawal wrote: "The government has responded to my demand to sack ministers associated with banned outfits by declaring me anti-state, issuing death threats and NAB notices."

While addressing a press conference on March 13, the PPP chairman had demanded the removal of three federal ministers for allegedly being "supporters of banned groups" and "having links with proscribed organisations".

"They [the PTI] are not taking action against the banned organisations because they had been their allies in the last general elections. The groups had been rebranded to help the PTI form its government," Bilawal had alleged, calling for the formation of a joint parliamentary national security committee (NSC) with the mandate to oversee implementation of the National Action Plan (NAP).

He also demanded that the PTI distance itself from the banned groups.

The allegations came as the PPP's senior leadership faced intensifying legal challenges in the form of a corruption inquiry involving fake bank accounts used to launder money, as well as a separate case involving fraudulent transfers of land in which Bilawal is one of the suspects.

Bilawal had reiterated his demand for the removal of three ministers on Saturday while addressing the PPP’s Sindh leaders during a provincial council meeting.

"None of this deters us from our principle stand," he said today, reiterating his earlier demand that a joint NSC be formed and action be taken against banned outfits.

The PPP chairman's tweet came the same day as Finance Minister Asad Umar, while speaking to the media, regretted that Bilawal's stance had been used by Indian media to score points against Pakistan.

Umar recalled that after Bilawal had given his speech in Parliament, he had stood up and said that statements made by the PPP chairman would be used by India against Pakistan.

Umar regretted that the next morning, the headlines of Indian newspapers and television programs said that "even Bilawal is saying Pakistan hides terrorists".

"Curse me as much as you want, but do not cause damage to Pakistan," Umar said, apparently addressing Bilawal.

According to Radio Pakistan, the finance minister also rejected the opposition's allegations about proscribed organisations providing PTI support in the elections.

Opinion

Editorial

Dangerous law
Updated 17 May, 2024

Dangerous law

It must remember that the same law can be weaponised against it one day, just as Peca was when the PTI took power.
Uncalled for pressure
17 May, 2024

Uncalled for pressure

THE recent press conferences by Senators Faisal Vawda and Talal Chaudhry, where they demanded evidence from judges...
KP tussle
17 May, 2024

KP tussle

THE growing war of words between KP Chief Minister Ali Amin Gandapur and Governor Faisal Karim Kundi is affecting...
Dubai properties
Updated 16 May, 2024

Dubai properties

It is hoped that any investigation that is conducted will be fair and that no wrongdoing will be excused.
In good faith
16 May, 2024

In good faith

THE ‘P’ in PTI might as well stand for perplexing. After a constant yo-yoing around holding talks, the PTI has...
CTDs’ shortcomings
16 May, 2024

CTDs’ shortcomings

WHILE threats from terrorist groups need to be countered on the battlefield through military means, long-term ...