SC judge cautions against weakening workplace harassment law, urges govt to strengthen it

Published February 13, 2019
Justice Azmat Saeed calls for development of mechanism that makes it easier for women to come forward with complaints. — File photo
Justice Azmat Saeed calls for development of mechanism that makes it easier for women to come forward with complaints. — File photo

A Supreme Court bench on Wednesday expressed concern over "whispers to weaken the law against women harassment at workplace", during the hearing of a contempt case against Justice Mansoor Ali Shah filed by former federal ombudsperson for Protection against Harassment of Women at Workplace, Yasmeen Abbasi.

Abbasi had issued a contempt notice to Justice Mansoor in 2016 after he had issued her arrest warrants, following which the police barged into her office to take her into custody.

During the hearing, Federal Ombudsperson for Protection against Harassment of Women at Workplace Kashmala Tariq, who appeared before the court today, told the bench that there were "zero complaints" of harassment from Sindh. The claim was dismissed by Justice Sheikh Azmat Saeed, who observed that absence of complaints did not mean the issue of workplace harassment did not exist in the province.

"People feel reluctant to talk about this matter," he remarked. "The problem is that you [Tariq] have not taken women into confidence."

He said that the authorities should develop a mechanism that would make it easier for women to lodge complaints and directed the attorney general and provincial governments to submit responses on the interpretation of the law against harassment at workplace.

He suggested that if provincial governments meant to amend the law, they should do so to strengthen it so that women can easily come forward and file complaints of incidents of harassment at workplaces. He also said that the attorney general and provincial advocate generals should provide legal assistance to the court by consulting international law.

"We should be ashamed of ourselves if we can't protect women from harassment," he said.

The hearing was adjourned until the first week of March.

Opinion

Editorial

Judiciary’s SOS
Updated 28 Mar, 2024

Judiciary’s SOS

The ball is now in CJP Isa’s court, and he will feel pressure to take action.
Data protection
28 Mar, 2024

Data protection

WHAT do we want? Data protection laws. When do we want them? Immediately. Without delay, if we are to prevent ...
Selling humans
28 Mar, 2024

Selling humans

HUMAN traders feed off economic distress; they peddle promises of a better life to the impoverished who, mired in...
New terror wave
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

New terror wave

The time has come for decisive government action against militancy.
Development costs
27 Mar, 2024

Development costs

A HEFTY escalation of 30pc in the cost of ongoing federal development schemes is one of the many decisions where the...
Aitchison controversy
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

Aitchison controversy

It is hoped that higher authorities realise that politics and nepotism have no place in schools.