Sri Lanka’s lawmakers

Published November 18, 2018

OF late, some very ugly scenes have played out in the Sri Lankan legislature. According to details, the pandemonium inside parliament has been unprecedented. A second no-confidence vote against Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapakse had caused much commotion. Not only was the speaker of parliament prevented from entering the house for an hour, the decorated chair from which he presided over the proceedings was taken away. When another chair, obviously unfit and unprepared for the grand hour, was brought in as a makeshift arrangement it proved too weak to withstand the violence that was wreaked on it. The seat was broken and its parts then served as ammunition for the charged members to attack one another with. The high point in the drama came when some lawmakers found red chilli powder to throw into the eyes of their enemies. Quite rightly, the behaviour of the politicians has been labelled as “disgraceful if not disgusting”.

Reflecting on the Sri Lankan parliamentary ruckus, perhaps we should thank our lucky stars for the small mercies that are sent our way. But for these gifts, we would be sulking at the ignominy of being the worst offenders in virtually every category of democratic rule. Indeed, it is often that our parliamentarians find themselves being publicly censured — justifiably so — for actions that are hardly befitting of those who should be setting an example of model conduct on the floor of the house, and demonstrating how dissenting views need not turn into acrimonious exchanges. As has been indicated in this space, the ugly war of words in recent days between government and opposition members has negatively impacted parliament’s work. However, many would perhaps say that matters are still not out of control, and point to the projectiles in Sri Lanka’s parliament. Be that as it may, it is incumbent to keeping raising the bar of mature, democratic politics and strengthening what is by no means an easy process.

Published in Dawn, November 18th, 2018

Opinion

Merging for what?

Merging for what?

The concern is that if the government is thinking of cutting costs through the merger, we might even lose the functionality levels we currently have.

Editorial

Dubai properties
Updated 16 May, 2024

Dubai properties

It is hoped that any investigation that is conducted will be fair and that no wrongdoing will be excused.
In good faith
16 May, 2024

In good faith

THE ‘P’ in PTI might as well stand for perplexing. After a constant yo-yoing around holding talks, the PTI has...
CTDs’ shortcomings
16 May, 2024

CTDs’ shortcomings

WHILE threats from terrorist groups need to be countered on the battlefield through military means, long-term ...
Reserved seats
Updated 15 May, 2024

Reserved seats

The ECP's decisions and actions clearly need to be reviewed in light of the country’s laws.
Secretive state
15 May, 2024

Secretive state

THERE is a fresh push by the state to stamp out all criticism by using the alibi of protecting national interests....
Plague of rape
15 May, 2024

Plague of rape

FLAWED narratives about women — from being weak and vulnerable to provocative and culpable — have led to...