Abe renews pledge to change Japan’s charter to boost troops

Published October 15, 2018
tokyo: Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe reviews a troop contingent during the ceremony.—Reuters
tokyo: Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe reviews a troop contingent during the ceremony.—Reuters

JAPANESE Prime Minister Shinzo Abe renewed his pledge on Sunday to push for a revision to the country’s war-renouncing constitution, in which he wants the military explicitly mentioned. Speaking before a field of about 4,000 troops, Abe said that a revision is needed to give his troops sense of pride. “You have gained public trust with your own hands,” Abe, wearing a tuxedo, told the troops in his address. “Now it’s time to fulfill our responsibility as politicians to accommodate an environment where all Self-Defence Force can accomplish their duties with sense of pride.” About 260 tanks and other military vehicles and 40 warplanes were exhibited at the event.

Re-elected as head of his ruling party last month and with up to three more years as Japan’s leader, Abe is determined to pursue his long-sought charter amendment. Many Japanese conservatives see Japan’s US-drafted constitution as a humiliation imposed after their World War II defeat. When the Self-Defence Force was established in 1954, public opinion was initially divided over its role, but today the force has gained support for its largely non-combat contribution in international peacekeeping efforts and disaster relief.

Abe wants to add a clause to Article 9 of the constitution, which bans the use of force in settling international disputes. He wants to explicitly permit the existence of Japan’s military. Abe’s ruling Liberal Democratic Party has continuously expanded the force’s international role by loosening interpretations of Article 9. In 2015, his government passed a defence law allowing Japanese troops to defend US and other allies in case of foreign attack, a fundamental change from its self-defence only policy. Two-thirds approval is needed in both houses to propose a revision, which would then be subject to a national referendum. Media surveys have shown most voters care more about their pay, education costs and the economy than a constitution revision.

Published in Dawn, October 15th, 2018

Opinion

Editorial

Energy inflation
Updated 23 May, 2024

Energy inflation

The widening gap between the haves and have-nots is already tearing apart Pakistan’s social fabric.
Culture of violence
23 May, 2024

Culture of violence

WHILE political differences are part of the democratic process, there can be no justification for such disagreements...
Flooding threats
23 May, 2024

Flooding threats

WITH temperatures in GB and KP forecasted to be four to six degrees higher than normal this week, the threat of...
Bulldozed bill
Updated 22 May, 2024

Bulldozed bill

Where once the party was championing the people and their voices, it is now devising new means to silence them.
Out of the abyss
22 May, 2024

Out of the abyss

ENFORCED disappearances remain a persistent blight on fundamental human rights in the country. Recent exchanges...
Holding Israel accountable
22 May, 2024

Holding Israel accountable

ALTHOUGH the International Criminal Court’s prosecutor wants arrest warrants to be issued for Israel’s prime...