LAHORE: Prof Vincent Monteil, a renowned French scholar on Islamic studies said here yesterday [April 16] that France considered Israel an artificial state and a “bridgehead of imperialism”. Speaking on “Muslim politics of General de Gaulle of France”, a lecture organised by the local French Cultural Centre, Prof Monteil, a personal friend of the French President, said that France was of the view that Israel might win temporarily but ultimately she would lose.

He said the Arabs — whether Muslims or Christians — had been living in Palestine for the last 18 hundred years, while the number of Jews on that territory did not exceed 57,000 only 50 years back. He said the General Assembly of the United Nations gave away 54 per cent of Palestine territory to Jews, but immediately after the partition the Israelis expanded their territory by force and occupied 56 per cent of Palestine. In the last year’s war, Israel occupied more and “this is a simple and plain robbery”.

Explaining the present policy of France towards the Muslim World, Prof Monteil said immediately before Gen de Gaulle came into power, his country had no policy towards Asia, particularly Muslim states. In de Gaulle’s regime the relations of France were growing with the Islamic World.

Published in Dawn, April 18th, 2018

Opinion

Editorial

Impending slaughter
Updated 07 May, 2024

Impending slaughter

Seven months into the slaughter, there are no signs of hope.
Wheat investigation
07 May, 2024

Wheat investigation

THE Shehbaz Sharif government is in a sort of Catch-22 situation regarding the alleged wheat import scandal. It is...
Naila’s feat
07 May, 2024

Naila’s feat

IN an inspirational message from the base camp of Nepal’s Mount Makalu, Pakistani mountaineer Naila Kiani stressed...
Plugging the gap
06 May, 2024

Plugging the gap

IN Pakistan, bias begins at birth for the girl child as discriminatory norms, orthodox attitudes and poverty impede...
Terrains of dread
Updated 06 May, 2024

Terrains of dread

Restored faith in the police is unachievable without political commitment and interprovincial support.
Appointment rules
Updated 06 May, 2024

Appointment rules

If the judiciary had the power to self-regulate, it ought to have exercised it instead of involving the legislature.