LAHORE: An anti-terrorism court on Tuesday acquitted Mustafa Kanju, son of former state minister Siddique Kanju, and his four security guards of murder of Zain, an orphan young boy, for lack of evidence.

The suspects had filed an acquittal application under Section 265-K of CrPC after complainant of the case and all prosecution witnesses did not testify against them.

Counsel for Kanju and others argued before the court that the prosecution had failed to prove the involvement of his clients in the murder. He stated that there was no probability of the conviction of the suspects of any offence as all witnesses and the complainant failed to identify the suspects arrested by the police.

He asked the court to accept the acquittal application and release the suspects.

A deputy prosecutor opposed the application and said complainant Sohail Afzal had told the media time and again that Mustafa Kanju killed his nephew. However, he said, the complainant later retracted.

He pointed out that cases were registered against the complainant and witnesses on charges of taking gifts from the accused party under section 213 of PPC. The section carries charges of taking gift, etc. to screen an offender from punishment.

The prosecutor said the complainant and the witnesses were persuaded to retract their statements. He urged the court to dismiss the acquittal application of the suspects.

ATC-I Presiding Judge Muhammad Qasim, however, allowed the application and acquitted Mustafa Kanju and his guards Sadiq, Asif, Saif and Akram.

The trial court had indicted the suspects for killing 16-year-old Zain and injuring Husain, 18, in Cavalry Ground area in April this year.

As per the prosecution, Kanju was allegedly drunk when his luxury car hit another car driven by a woman, who was never identified by the investigators. It said Kanju got infuriated and opened fire at his opponent party. However, the woman had already driven away from the scene and Zain and Husain, the passers-by, were hit by the firing. Zain succumbed to his injuries at a local hospital. Kanju had escaped from the scene and later was arrested from Khushab.

Gulberg police had lodged FIR against Kanju and his guards under section 7-ATA and section 302 of PPC. In this case, the prosecution had also filed a petition before the Lahore High Court with a request to transfer the trial to some other judge expressing distrust of the incumbent.

Published in Dawn, October 28th, 2015

On a mobile phone? Get the Dawn Mobile App: Apple Store | Google Play

Opinion

Merging for what?

Merging for what?

The concern is that if the government is thinking of cutting costs through the merger, we might even lose the functionality levels we currently have.

Editorial

Dubai properties
Updated 16 May, 2024

Dubai properties

It is hoped that any investigation that is conducted will be fair and that no wrongdoing will be excused.
In good faith
16 May, 2024

In good faith

THE ‘P’ in PTI might as well stand for perplexing. After a constant yo-yoing around holding talks, the PTI has...
CTDs’ shortcomings
16 May, 2024

CTDs’ shortcomings

WHILE threats from terrorist groups need to be countered on the battlefield through military means, long-term ...
Reserved seats
Updated 15 May, 2024

Reserved seats

The ECP's decisions and actions clearly need to be reviewed in light of the country’s laws.
Secretive state
15 May, 2024

Secretive state

THERE is a fresh push by the state to stamp out all criticism by using the alibi of protecting national interests....
Plague of rape
15 May, 2024

Plague of rape

FLAWED narratives about women — from being weak and vulnerable to provocative and culpable — have led to...