Movie examines trauma of soldiers

Published October 20, 2014
London: US actor Brad Pitt (centre) joins fellow cast-members Jon Bernthal (left), Logan Lerman (second left), Shia LaBeouf (second right) and Michael Pena of World War II action film  ‘Fury’ at a photocall during the BFI Film Festival here on Sunday.—AFP
London: US actor Brad Pitt (centre) joins fellow cast-members Jon Bernthal (left), Logan Lerman (second left), Shia LaBeouf (second right) and Michael Pena of World War II action film ‘Fury’ at a photocall during the BFI Film Festival here on Sunday.—AFP

LONDON: Hollywood star Brad Pitt said on Sunday that his new movie “Fury”, a brutal depiction of World War II, sought to recognise the psychological trauma endured by soldiers.

The movie, which has its European premiere on Sunday at the close of the London Film Festival, follows a tank crew as it pushes behind enemy lines in the dying days of the war in Germany in 1945.

“It was not a film about sides,” Pitt told reporters. “For me it was a film about that accumulative psychic trauma that every soldier carries to some extent”.

He added: “This film is about the soldiers’ exhaustion from the cold, hunger and the accumulative effect on a daily basis. We took that to heart”.

I hope the soldiers will walk away from this and feel they are recognised. “Pitt, along with a number of other actors in the film, gave his support to last month’s international “Invictus Games” for injured veterans, which took place in London.

“I learnt a lot from this film,” the 50-year-old said, adding that his role as battle-hardened army sergeant “Wardaddy” was “a real study in leadership”.

“Because of this, I am now a better father,” said Pitt, who has six children with actress Angelina Jolie.

He also admitted he became rather attached to the Sherman tank in which he and his team spent much of the film.

“There’s nothing ergonomic about a tank. But we were forced to familiarise ourselves with the tank and find our comfort spots,” he said, adding: “I became quite proprietorial”.

The film’s director, David Ayer, said Pitt spent a lot of time in the tank on set.

“It was like his eagle’s nest where he would look down on us,” he said, to which the actor quipped: “It was the best view”.

Published in Dawn, October 20th, 2014

Opinion

Merging for what?

Merging for what?

The concern is that if the government is thinking of cutting costs through the merger, we might even lose the functionality levels we currently have.

Editorial

Dubai properties
Updated 16 May, 2024

Dubai properties

It is hoped that any investigation that is conducted will be fair and that no wrongdoing will be excused.
In good faith
16 May, 2024

In good faith

THE ‘P’ in PTI might as well stand for perplexing. After a constant yo-yoing around holding talks, the PTI has...
CTDs’ shortcomings
16 May, 2024

CTDs’ shortcomings

WHILE threats from terrorist groups need to be countered on the battlefield through military means, long-term ...
Reserved seats
Updated 15 May, 2024

Reserved seats

The ECP's decisions and actions clearly need to be reviewed in light of the country’s laws.
Secretive state
15 May, 2024

Secretive state

THERE is a fresh push by the state to stamp out all criticism by using the alibi of protecting national interests....
Plague of rape
15 May, 2024

Plague of rape

FLAWED narratives about women — from being weak and vulnerable to provocative and culpable — have led to...