UK spy centre faces court action over surveillance

Published July 3, 2014
“These widespread attacks on providers and collectives undermine the trust we all place on the internet,” said Eric King, Privacy Inter­national’s deputy director. — File photo
“These widespread attacks on providers and collectives undermine the trust we all place on the internet,” said Eric King, Privacy Inter­national’s deputy director. — File photo

LONDON: Britain’s electronic eavesdropping centre GCHQ faces legal action from seven internet service providers who accuse it of illegally accessing “potentially millions of people’s private communications”, campaigners said on Wednesday.

The claim threatens fresh embarrassment for the British authorities after leaks by fugitive NSA worker Edward Snowden showed GCHQ was a key player in covert US surveillance operations globally.

The complaint has been filed at a London court by ISPs Riseup and May First/People Link of the US, GreenNet of Britain, Greenhost of the Netherlands, Mango of Zimbabwe, Jinbonet of South Korea and the Chaos Computer Club of Germany, plus campaigners Privacy International.

They claim that GCHQ carried out “targeted operations against internet service providers to conduct mass and intrusive surveillance”. The move follows a series of reports by German magazine Der Spiegel which claimed to detail GCHQ’s illicit activities.

These reportedly included targeting a Belgian telecommunications company, Belgacom, where staff computers were infected with malware in a “quantum insert” attack to secure access to customers.

The legal complaint says this was “not an isolated attack” and alleges violations of Britain’s Human Rights Act and the European Convention of Human Rights.

“These widespread attacks on providers and collectives undermine the trust we all place on the internet and greatly endangers the world’s most powerful tool for democracy and free expression,” said Eric King, Privacy Inter­national’s deputy director.

Published in Dawn, July 3rd, 2014

Opinion

Merging for what?

Merging for what?

The concern is that if the government is thinking of cutting costs through the merger, we might even lose the functionality levels we currently have.

Editorial

Dubai properties
Updated 16 May, 2024

Dubai properties

It is hoped that any investigation that is conducted will be fair and that no wrongdoing will be excused.
In good faith
16 May, 2024

In good faith

THE ‘P’ in PTI might as well stand for perplexing. After a constant yo-yoing around holding talks, the PTI has...
CTDs’ shortcomings
16 May, 2024

CTDs’ shortcomings

WHILE threats from terrorist groups need to be countered on the battlefield through military means, long-term ...
Reserved seats
Updated 15 May, 2024

Reserved seats

The ECP's decisions and actions clearly need to be reviewed in light of the country’s laws.
Secretive state
15 May, 2024

Secretive state

THERE is a fresh push by the state to stamp out all criticism by using the alibi of protecting national interests....
Plague of rape
15 May, 2024

Plague of rape

FLAWED narratives about women — from being weak and vulnerable to provocative and culpable — have led to...