SHC rejects Musharraf's review petition

Published June 25, 2014
Former military ruler Gen (retd) Pervez Musharraf. — File photo
Former military ruler Gen (retd) Pervez Musharraf. — File photo

KARACHI: The Sindh High Court on Wednesday rejected a petition filed by former military ruler Gen (retd) Pervez Musharraf seeking a review of the court’s earlier decision to remove Musharraf's name from the exit control list (ECL) after 15 days, DawnNews reported.

On June 12, the SHC had struck down the federal government’s order of preventing Musharraf from leaving the country, but said the former military ruler would have to wait for two weeks to find out if he could actually travel abroad as the court also suspended the operation of its judgment for 15 days, which enabled the federation to file an appeal in the Supreme Court.

The review petition filed by the counsel of the former military strongman had requested the court to immediately implement its decision instead of waiting for 15 days for the government to challenge the decision.

The petition had contended that Musharraf should be allowed to travel abroad to meet his ailing mother.


Also read: SHC allows Musharraf to go abroad


Earlier on Monday, the Supreme Court had suspended the SHC order till it decided the government’s appeal against removing Musharraf’s name from the ECL. It said that the federal government could not take the risk of allowing the former president to leave the country because there was a great incentive for him to flee in view of a treason case that involved the death penalty.


Examine: SC suspends SHC order in Musharraf case


The SHC was informed today that the Supreme Court had rejected its earlier order to strike Musharraf's name off the ECL. Following the Supreme Court’s decision, the Sindh High Court declared Musharraf's application inadmissible for hearing and subsequently dismissed it.

— With additional reporting by Shafi Baloch

Opinion

Merging for what?

Merging for what?

The concern is that if the government is thinking of cutting costs through the merger, we might even lose the functionality levels we currently have.

Editorial

Dubai properties
Updated 16 May, 2024

Dubai properties

It is hoped that any investigation that is conducted will be fair and that no wrongdoing will be excused.
In good faith
16 May, 2024

In good faith

THE ‘P’ in PTI might as well stand for perplexing. After a constant yo-yoing around holding talks, the PTI has...
CTDs’ shortcomings
16 May, 2024

CTDs’ shortcomings

WHILE threats from terrorist groups need to be countered on the battlefield through military means, long-term ...
Reserved seats
Updated 15 May, 2024

Reserved seats

The ECP's decisions and actions clearly need to be reviewed in light of the country’s laws.
Secretive state
15 May, 2024

Secretive state

THERE is a fresh push by the state to stamp out all criticism by using the alibi of protecting national interests....
Plague of rape
15 May, 2024

Plague of rape

FLAWED narratives about women — from being weak and vulnerable to provocative and culpable — have led to...