Imran adamant on rigging stance, LHC hearing marred by ruckus

Published May 7, 2014
Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI) chief Imran Khan. — File photo by AFP
Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI) chief Imran Khan. — File photo by AFP

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court's (LHC) hearing of a writ petition filed by Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI) chief Imran Khan challenging an order of the Election Commission of Pakistan on an appeal for vote recount in Lahore's NA-122 constituency was adjourned to May 12, DawnNews reported.

The hearing led by LHC's Chief Justice Umar Ata Bandial began with a delay after the PTI chief's appearance was marred by a scuffle between party activists and security personnel deputed at court premises.

By the time the hearing began, Khan had already left the court's premises and returned to his residence.

During the hearing, Justice Bandial said the courts respected all politicians but at the same time respecting the courts was also mandatory for all politicians.

He further said that the difference between the premises of a courtroom and a rally point should be clear.

When Khan's counsel Ahmad Awais offered a verbal apology over the incident, Justice Bandial refused to accept it and sought a written explanation over the incident.

He later adjourned the hearing to May 12.

Khan had lost Lahore's NA-122 to Pakistan Muslim League- Nawaz's (PML-N's) Sardar Ayaz Sadiq who is the incumbent Speaker of the National Assembly.


Imran adamant on rigging charges


After reaching his residence, Khan in a press conference reiterated his stance on the rigging charges that he had earlier leveled against former chief justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry and the Jang media group.

He said those involved in rigging should be tried under Article 6 of the Constitution.

He said a movement would be launched against the government if it tried to stop the protest rally scheduled to held by the PTI on May 11 against rigging.

Khan also accused the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) of playing the role of friendly opposition.

Speaking on the peace talks between the government and the Pakistani Taliban, Khan advocated that the process was in the interests of Pakistan.

He also said that the trial of former military dictator Gen (r) Pervez Musharraf should be resolved in accordance with the law and Constitution of Pakistan.

Opinion

Merging for what?

Merging for what?

The concern is that if the government is thinking of cutting costs through the merger, we might even lose the functionality levels we currently have.

Editorial

Dubai properties
Updated 16 May, 2024

Dubai properties

It is hoped that any investigation that is conducted will be fair and that no wrongdoing will be excused.
In good faith
16 May, 2024

In good faith

THE ‘P’ in PTI might as well stand for perplexing. After a constant yo-yoing around holding talks, the PTI has...
CTDs’ shortcomings
16 May, 2024

CTDs’ shortcomings

WHILE threats from terrorist groups need to be countered on the battlefield through military means, long-term ...
Reserved seats
Updated 15 May, 2024

Reserved seats

The ECP's decisions and actions clearly need to be reviewed in light of the country’s laws.
Secretive state
15 May, 2024

Secretive state

THERE is a fresh push by the state to stamp out all criticism by using the alibi of protecting national interests....
Plague of rape
15 May, 2024

Plague of rape

FLAWED narratives about women — from being weak and vulnerable to provocative and culpable — have led to...