Foreign Minister Hina Rabbani Khar. – Photo by Reuters/File
Foreign Minister Hina Rabbani Khar. – Photo by Reuters/File

NEW YORK: Foreign Minister Hina Rabbani Khar late Tuesday said that whoever calls the Haqqani network “an asset for Pakistan” did not represent the Pakistani government, a report from BBC Urdu said.

She further said that army chief General Ashfaq Pervez Kayani did not hold such opinions in the present circumstances.

The foreign minister was addressing a discussion titled “Pakistan’s Democratic Journey” held by Asia Society, a renowned think-tank, in New York on Tuesday evening. The discussion was moderated by a political columnist of Time, a weekly magazine in the United States.

The moderator asked Khar about an interview given by General Kayani to the New York Times four years ago in which he allegedly stated that he considered the Haqqani network an “asset” for Pakistan.

In response, Khar she did not know who had said it, adding that whoever calls the Haqqani network an asset to Pakistan could not be a representative of the Pakistani government.

She further said that General Kayani no longer held that opinion.

More From This Section

Nawaz, Zardari discuss political situation, security

The two also discussed the ongoing operation in Karachi and the dialogue process with Taliban.

Militants attacked after soldier hurt in blast

Helicopter gunships attacked militant hideouts in North Waziristan after a security man was injured in an explosion.

Saudi Arabia warns PIA of halting flights over unpaid dues

Saudi civil aviation authority threatened PIA of stopping all flights in case dues are not cleared by April 17.

Treason case: Evidences found only against Musharraf, says Sheikh

The special court said that the decision regarding the appointment of the prosecutor would be announced on April 18.

Comments are closed.

Comments (25)

January 16, 2013 11:23 am
"She further said that army chief General Ashfaq Pervez Kayani did not hold such opinions in the present circumstances." That means he considered them assets in the past ?................This is the reason Mrs. Khar the world doesn't believe in what you say........You considered them assets in the past and now when the situation is bad to worse, you are disowning them.........Wah re Hina...
Gary West
January 16, 2013 4:20 pm
Ms Hina tries her best to present Pakistan in a good light, but I am afraid its just too late
John Wayne
January 16, 2013 11:17 am
The lady has got an impossibly unenviable job to represent the masochist and religiously berserk society of Pakistan.
January 16, 2013 3:19 pm
I don't believe a word she says. Pakistani govt and establishment are expert liars.
January 16, 2013 5:17 pm
Well, Afghan mujahideens were considered an asset at one time. Should you not apply the same rule there. Would that mean that now the US should not fight against the Taliban because they considered them an asset at one time. It depends on what is going at the moment and what you think make sense. That is why we use our brains to analyze the situation as it develops, and not make a decision and stick to it no matter if it is proven wrong.
January 16, 2013 12:40 pm
rightly said .. haqqani network is uncle sam's property !!
Aftab Nabi
January 16, 2013 11:30 am
So that means Gen K is not in sync with the government?
January 16, 2013 11:35 am
Pakistani government is deadly lair which reflect the nature of pakistani people. I know you will not show this comment, it does not matter but at least you writers should know.
January 16, 2013 11:56 am
If the army does not hold the that opinion, then why is it not rooting out this group? Action lady speak louder than words.
January 16, 2013 11:51 am
Watched her interview on Bloomberg TV channel and she came across as very well.
January 16, 2013 12:09 pm
Ms. Khar has surprised many. I for one had under-estimated her. If only she was not part of this band.
January 16, 2013 4:02 pm
yes just like you people considered Shiv Sinha an asset we considered Haqqani network an asset.
January 16, 2013 1:09 pm
I have simple solution for all India-Pakistan problem. Bring Pak Army and ISI under civilian rule. All problem will be solved within one year. Pak Army is creating India phobia to loot pakistan and its people are suffering.
January 16, 2013 1:00 pm
why would she defend general ? let army defend themselves as they never give a helping hand to democratic govt.
January 16, 2013 1:48 pm
She is indirectly pointing to Kayani and putting all blames of support to Haqqani's on army. Army will surely retaliate...
January 16, 2013 1:07 pm
in 60 years Pakistan did not learn how to set-up democracy. rather it did not want to set this up because of the fear of India and military always wanted to be monitoring and not trusting civilian government. it is not going to benefit Pakistan being caught in between. it has to make decision either to go for military or for democracy instead of confusing. this will lead to no where.
Salimkhan Shadit
January 16, 2013 1:08 pm
Very well, she was doing her regular job of denying everything. There was not a single instance on which she gave any sold opinion.
January 16, 2013 10:08 pm
Or perhaps the Armed Forces need to mend their ways?!
January 16, 2013 1:44 pm
Pakistan & All its establishments must make an introspection and evaulation to make a last U-turn to save the naiton and its 180 million from the self destructive course of many years which is on the edge. A break down will have severe consequences to its society and neighbouring areas.
January 16, 2013 8:21 pm
gary thanks very much for your concern towards kindly go back to your council flat and have a good night !!!
Siddique Malik
January 16, 2013 2:00 pm
Every time foreign minister of Pakistan acts as a spokesperson for Pakistan's army chief, she invalidates her mantra -- army is no longer a dominant player, army has fixed its thinking on Afghanistan, etc. -- that she has been programmed by the army to constantly repeat. Like any bad software package, she has a bug, too, and in her case it is the inability to avoid self-contradiction. If army is not going to interfere in Afghanistan, as she unconvincingly says, is it also going to stop interfering in the constitutional dynamics of its own country? Is it going to accept that its past seizures of democratically elected governments were in violation of Article 6 of Pakistan's constitution? And in the Bloomberg interview was a complete disaster? She was nervous and unsure of herself like any fact-less propagandist is. She kept interrupting the interviewer. Siddique Malik, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.
A Shah
January 16, 2013 2:39 pm
Can we do anymore to ridicule ourselves in front of the world? If we go by what she is saying then it seems the whole of the Pakistan govt and the Armed Forces are "not be a representative of the Pakistani government". Our politicians really need to be quiet!
A Shah
January 16, 2013 2:40 pm
She made a complete fool of her self by pretty much contrdicting the start the Army takes.
January 16, 2013 2:26 pm
She is just a poker faced lier. Collectively lying to an obvious will not do us any good as a nation in the long run. We have dug our own grave.
S.A. Hyder, Ph.D.
January 16, 2013 7:39 pm
As long as the Haqqani Network was on the road to "destroying" India, the Pakistan Army and General APK were not only considering the said network as assets but were also whole-heartedly and materially helping it. However, when this same network turned its destructive activities on Pakistan it turned out to be a whole different ball game. It is all politics. A successful politician is one who claims the sun is shining when it is the dark of the night and people believe him/her!
Explore: Indian elections 2014
Explore: Indian elections 2014
How much do you know about Indian Elections?
How much do you know about Indian Elections?
From The Newspaper