Dr Tahirul Qadri has vowed to lead a march of millions on the federal capital Islamabad on Jan 14 in what he terms an attempt to bring electoral reforms before the upcoming general election.

ISLAMABAD: A constitutional petition was moved before the Islamabad High Court on Thursday against Dr Tahirul Qadri, alleging Tehrik-i-Minhajul Quran (TMQ) chief was attempting to establish a parallel parliament and posing a direct threat to Pakistan’s sovereignty.

Petitioner Shahid Orakzai pleaded to the IHC to direct the Chief Commissioner Islamabad to prevent any gathering in the federal Capital for such objectives.

The court was asked to declare that “no person…be allowed to assemble any decision making body above the Majlis-e-Shoora (Parliament).”

Dr Qadri has vowed to lead a march of millions on Islamabad on Jan 14 in what he terms an attempt to bring electoral reforms before the upcoming general election.

A similar petition was moved n Wednesday pleading the Lahore High Court to stop Dr Tahirul Qadri’s planned “anti-democracy march”.

Petitioner Orakzai pointed out on Thursday that Qadri had held a public audience in Lahore on Dec 23 and the Punjab government had remained a “silent spectator” to the ‘flagrant misuse of the fundamental right of freedom of expression’.

“Private television channels broadcast his political sermon worldwide although no foreigner can misuse Freedom of Expression under Article 19, which is a right of citizen of Pakistan,” the petition pointed out.

The petition requested the court to inquire from the Director General Immigration and Passports whether the respondent entered Pakistan as a citizen or otherwise.

Orakzai further stated in the petition that Qadri, who had acquired citizenship of another state, could not exercise the Right of Movement under Article 15, the Right of Assembly under Article 16, the Right of Association under Article 17 and the Freedom of Expression under Article 19 because all of these freedoms were given only to citizens by the Constitution, and were being misused by the respondent.

He said that no association or union could operate as a full-fledged political party until it complied with constitutional requirements.

Any attempt to establish a parallel legislative body seeking to overrule and overthrow the parliament would be a “direct challenge to the sovereignty of Pakistan which this court is duty bound to defend”, the petition argued.

Opinion

Editorial

Business concerns
Updated 26 Apr, 2024

Business concerns

There is no doubt that these issues are impeding a positive business clime, which is required to boost private investment and economic growth.
Musical chairs
26 Apr, 2024

Musical chairs

THE petitioners are quite helpless. Yet again, they are being expected to wait while the bench supposed to hear...
Global arms race
26 Apr, 2024

Global arms race

THE figure is staggering. According to the annual report of Sweden-based think tank Stockholm International Peace...
Digital growth
Updated 25 Apr, 2024

Digital growth

Democratising digital development will catalyse a rapid, if not immediate, improvement in human development indicators for the underserved segments of the Pakistani citizenry.
Nikah rights
25 Apr, 2024

Nikah rights

THE Supreme Court recently delivered a judgement championing the rights of women within a marriage. The ruling...
Campus crackdowns
25 Apr, 2024

Campus crackdowns

WHILE most Western governments have either been gladly facilitating Israel’s genocidal war in Gaza, or meekly...