Tax amnesty

Published October 3, 2012

THE confusion of those absorbing Finance Minister Hafeez Sheikh’s comments on the planned tax amnesty for the 3.8 million potential tax dodgers with undeclared assets here and abroad is perfectly understandable. He is being ambiguous, perhaps intentionally. He says such proposals are meant for netting those with large amounts of black money to hide. But he reminds everyone that it is not yet ‘government policy’ (because it requires presidential approval). He doesn’t say that it will not become government policy and so it may be safe to assume that the proposal remains on the table. Apparently, the minister favours the amnesty and wants the Federal Board of Revenue to shift its focus to those with large amounts of black money. He has chosen to be ambiguous in his comments possibly because of objections raised by visiting IMF officials.

When the PPP government came up with its first tax amnesty scheme in 2008, it promised not to reward dodgers. It has failed to keep its word. Only a few months ago, it announced a reprieve for stock investors to provide a fresh trigger to investment in shares for boosting capital markets. The amnesty is being touted by the FBR as the last opportunity for tax dodgers to come clean. Still, chances of tax evaders availing of the scheme are as slim as that of government action against them. After all, they already have legislation in place guaranteeing tax exemption for money brought into Pakistan through normal banking channels as remittances. This legislation gives tax evaders enough space to whiten their untaxed money. They pay a small commission to a money-exchange dealer and get remittances in their names. It is hugely frustrating to see the state rewarding those who cheat the government with the help of a corrupt tax machinery.

Media reports suggest the FBR is pushing the proposal as a one-time effort to generate additional revenues to meet the tax target for the current fiscal. However, the scheme is unlikely to help the FBR rake in significant amounts of tax. The 2008 amnesty had yielded just about Rs2.5bn. India has had more than 14 disclosure schemes but the response has been far from encouraging and the ‘parallel’ economy continues to thrive there. Shouldn’t we learn from the Indian experience if not from our own? A better way would be to deal sternly with tax dodgers whom the government intends to help in laundering their illegal wealth. The FBR claims to have all the required information about them. If it must reward someone, it should reward honest taxpayers and not tax evaders.

Opinion

Editorial

Large projects again?
Updated 03 Jun, 2024

Large projects again?

Government must focus on debt sustainability by curtailing its spending and mobilising more resources.
Local power
03 Jun, 2024

Local power

A SIGNIFICANT policy paper was recently debated at an HRCP gathering, calling for the constitutional protection of...
Child-friendly courts
03 Jun, 2024

Child-friendly courts

IN a country where the child rights debate has been a belated one, it is heartening to note that a recent Supreme...
Dutch courage
Updated 02 Jun, 2024

Dutch courage

ECP has been supported wholeheartedly in implementing twisted interpretations of democratic process by some willing collaborators in the legislature.
New World cricket
02 Jun, 2024

New World cricket

HAVING finished as semi-finalists and runners-up in the last two editions of the T20 World Cup in familiar ...
Dead on arrival?
02 Jun, 2024

Dead on arrival?

Whatever the motivations for Gaza peace plan, it is difficult to see the scheme succeeding.