India clashes with Pakistan at UN

Published Oct 02, 2012 03:31am

Indian-FM-KRISHNA-670
Foreign Minister of India Shri S. M. Krishna speaks during the 67th session of the United Nations General Assembly at the United Nations in New York on October 1, 2012. — Photo by AFP

UNITED NATIONS: India's external affairs minister took on Pakistan at the United Nations on Monday for raising the disputed Himalayan territory of Kashmir.

S. M. Krishna told the General Assembly that India has resumed dialogue with Pakistan and wants to normalise relations.

But he lashed out at a speech last week by President Asif Ali Zardarif, saying the neighboring nation had no business meddling in India's predominantly Muslim state of Jammu and Kashmir, which India claims as sovereign territory.

''An unwarranted reference has been made to Jammu and Kashmir from this podium,'' he said, adding, ''We wish to make it abundantly clear that Jammu and Kashmir is an integral part of India.''

Zardari said in his speech that Kashmir remained ''a symbol of the failures of the United Nations system rather than its strengths.'' He said a solution could only be reached in an ''environment of cooperation.''

As the annual high-level meeting of the General Assembly wound down on Monday night, representatives of India and Pakistan traded several rounds of rebuttals before a mostly empty chamber.

A violent separatist insurgency that started in 1989 drew a crackdown by Indian forces that has killed about 68,000 people in Kashmir, where public resentment against Indian rule runs deep.

The rebellion is largely suppressed, with occasional flare-ups. The Indian army said last week that a fierce gunbattle killed a suspected rebel and a soldier.

Earlier this month, Indian police arrested Merajuddin Wani, one of the longest-surviving rebel commanders in Indian-controlled Kashmir.


Do you have information you wish to share with Dawn.com? You can email our News Desk to share news tips, reports and general feedback. You can also email the Blog Desk if you have an opinion or narrative to share, or reach out to the Special Projects Desk to send us your Photos, or Videos.

More From This Section

Comments (41) (Closed)


Rajesh
Oct 02, 2012 12:33pm
We do not want to study any books. Watching the actions of the followers is enough for us
Riz
Oct 03, 2012 08:33am
this not India where RSS, BJP, Congress can flirt only oceans of election to waste minority of 160 millions of India here whole situation is different pls don
Syed
Oct 03, 2012 08:24pm
The author wanted to write about the clash in T20. He just got distracted.
Ammad Malik
Oct 02, 2012 09:59am
He was referring to the UNs failures over the past 60 years on issues such as this. As far as Kashmir is concerned now, I don't think the current government intends to pursue UN on the issue.
saima
Oct 04, 2012 03:06am
Janaan excellent reply to Salim. I wonder what Salim has to say on this ????????
janaan
Oct 02, 2012 07:14pm
Salim, total population of Baluchistan is around 8 million. out of that, 60% are baluchis. If Millions have been killed, how many baluch are left then. Are you really a baluchi or some one from East. PAKISTAN ZINDABAD.
gaurav raj
Oct 02, 2012 07:33am
well said.....so true
salim
Oct 02, 2012 11:05am
this is time for azad balochistan millions of balochi disappear no humanright act in pakistan jago azadi is not far azadi is waitin balochi people media also hiding story and coverage of balochi people killing azad balochistan zindabad
Sarabjeet (India)
Oct 02, 2012 06:45am
Good move by both the sides because the elections are coming up. President's party is using its old game for the vote banks and the same game is being played on the Indian side, and common men like us on both sides of the border are being fooled into believing that our governments care for their country and its interests. After elections, all this will be forgotten. Mark my words. :)
HM, Canada
Oct 02, 2012 05:57am
Well done Zardari... Kashmir is disputed territory and India has no claim on it against the will of Kashmiri people.
Guru
Oct 02, 2012 06:55am
Sadly, two nations on this earth were created solely on the basis of religion. Israel and Pakistan. Enough said
Ramesh C Manghirmalani
Oct 02, 2012 04:21am
He is right it is army and ISI creating problems....
zoro
Oct 02, 2012 03:37am
Public resentment or Pakistans resentment ??? Hence forward Pakistan should be very very cautious on how it handles Kashmir solution .... as there are chances of loosing Balochistan now ... leave alone POK..
Ashraf
Oct 02, 2012 04:55am
When you repeat a lie again and again truth comes out.Same applies to India.If Kashmir is an integral part of India,then what are seven lakh Indian troops(Army),Intelligence agencies,Paramilitary forces doing in Kashmir? Reality is India cannot controle Kashmir without Army and India knows this well.Let us wait.Kashmir can change overnight and the whole region will crumble under the weight and anger which Kashmir possess.India is playing a dangerous game.History teaches everything.
Morad 786
Oct 02, 2012 06:39am
Kudous to Zardari...even Musharaf was afraid to make the stance on Kashmir...
T.M. Reddy
Oct 02, 2012 06:37am
Religion should not be a doctrine to rule a nation because nation normally has many variety of people with different ideas, religions, and interests. No nation should be guided by the religious philosophy - religion is for self not enforcing on others.
atis
Oct 02, 2012 07:29am
Mr Morad be reminded that religion can not be basis of any nation.It can not sustain its independence.Pakistan has been a victim already and may be again......
Peace Lover
Oct 02, 2012 09:36am
Mr. Zardari should understand that after 68 years UN has no more roll in Kasmir , dialouge between India & Pakistan is the only way to resolve the issue.
mohammad hamza
Oct 02, 2012 07:25am
The basis was mutually agreed upon by India and Pakistan duly supervised by the British. India reneged on it as also the UN Resolutions therafter.
Raw Agent
Oct 02, 2012 05:11am
Wondering how the title of this news is "India Clashes with pakistan"
james
Oct 02, 2012 08:50am
what about hindustan....
dINESH
Oct 03, 2012 05:08pm
India has many religions. Although hindus are in the majority the minority religions are not disappearing, unlike in Pakistan.
Ahmed
Oct 02, 2012 10:03am
true
asif
Oct 02, 2012 08:48am
Well...the same applies to Baluchistan..eh!
Kayenn
Oct 02, 2012 10:54am
Please continue to wait..... Take care of Baluchistan and Sind !!!!! if religion was to be the only rationale, why Bangladesh separated ????
Cyrus Howell
Oct 03, 2012 02:26am
Pakistan will lose Balochistan because those people are willing to fight. When people in a section of the country are lost to right wing paramilitary death squads the state usually is the loser. That is the usual result. People will stand up and fight injustice. Why should they be afraid if they are to be butchered either way?
Cyrus Howell
Oct 03, 2012 02:17am
"The two most important aspects of history are the good or poor administration of wars and public affairs." GIBBON A religion has no administration that can run a country's day to day business.
Cyrus Howell
Oct 03, 2012 02:11am
True.
Cyrus Howell
Oct 03, 2012 02:10am
Yes.
Adil Jadoon
Oct 03, 2012 01:52am
Followers or supposed followers?
Rafay Ahmad
Oct 03, 2012 01:50am
Peace has to be the ultimate solution. The problem is, we can not go far in the race of arms and weapons.. We need to take rational measures. South Asia needs a stable environment..
Adil Jadoon
Oct 03, 2012 01:51am
You standing for public office or something?
asgher
Oct 02, 2012 08:40am
both sides are running their mouth to please the public. Shame on such leaders that prime to fool their public instead of actually doing something to help.
KZA
Oct 02, 2012 08:34am
Well my friend please study the Islam and you will change your opinion.
M Yousaf
Oct 02, 2012 08:38am
Very True
saeed
Oct 02, 2012 08:37am
very right
Mkhan
Oct 02, 2012 06:12pm
After the partition of India Baluchistan chose to be with Pakistan and was not forced to therefore its is not disputed territory whereas the same can not be said for Kashmir.
Muhammad Alvi
Oct 02, 2012 02:05pm
Very true statement of facts. It means that Zardari should not have brought up this issue in his UN speech and krishna should not have reacted so badly, but then how else can they score points!
Indian-Delhi
Oct 02, 2012 07:19am
its really a strong statement given by indian FM, nd i guess not a new one.india is very clear on its stand from the day one.kashimir issue is raised by president zardari seeing to the general election which is coming , nd he knew that he hsnt done much fr the ppl of pakistan so he gave such statement to get his vote bank alive.
XYZ
Oct 03, 2012 09:17am
Mr.Khan You need to read correct history not the one in your syllabus.
Vigilant
Oct 02, 2012 04:11pm
So much to amman ki asha......i don't think their can be any peace between India and Pakistan