Bitter coffee after meal

Published Sep 29, 2012 10:00pm

IF former Prime Minister P.V. Narasimha Rao had been a pupil at a toff English school like Eton or Rugby, he would have made the perfect prefect: he knew how to torture the hopeful.

It is well known in political circles that Rao did not waste too much morality on politics. His priorities were different. At the top came what was useful to him; second place went to what was good for the country.

There was no third. Rao was cynical enough to be a brilliant administrator. Ministers who did not know their limits quickly found out the limits of his patience. But they were the lucky lot.

For every minister there were four MPs thirsting for his job. Rao was a master at buying the loyalty of those waiting at the door of cabinet by offering them hope and postponing delivery. This was a refined form of Chinese torture, and he was so good at it that one assumes he must have enjoyed it thoroughly.

The only time when he turned the cabinet into a Diwali sale was when his job was under threat after the demolition of the Babri mosque in December 1992.

In January 1993, he handed over a lollipop to every Congress Muslim MP within eye contact. Needless to add, Congress Muslim MPs swallowed this lollipop with great glee; the mosque occupied only minor space in their conscience.

Once Rao’s job was safe, he made every other aspirant in the long queue sweat till the pips burst. His last reshuffle was perhaps six months before the elections.

The only minister who was given the luxury of taking his time over joining the cabinet was the surprise choice for finance minister, a mild-mannered and soft-spoken former deputy chairman of the planning commission called Dr Manmohan Singh. Dr Singh took 48 hours to accept a job which any Congress politician would have accepted in 48 seconds.

He was also the only cabinet minister whose resignation, later on, was turned down. When P. Chidambaram and Madhav Rao Scindia resigned, over different issues, they might have been taken aback at the alacrity with which their resignations were accepted, given that both had done good work in office.

Dr Singh does not possess his mentor’s cold political mind, but he has learnt something from Rao: he can keep a cool distance from the acrobatics of wannabes. But as he prepares for the final shuffle of a pack of cards in a gambling game replete with unexpected and even unmanageable variations, he is suddenly faced with a rare dilemma.

While his own party is teeming with those desperate to become prince for even a day, Congress allies are becoming the opposite of Oliver Twist: they want less, not more.

Mamata Banerjee, of course, wants nothing at all. Dr Singh can live with that. But life becomes much more problematic when the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK), a party famous for gulping more than it can chew, decides that it can do without additional nutrition since the menu comes nowhere near its appetite.

Contrast this with 2009 when DMK ministers were pleading anxiously for what can only be called B Class portfolios. Nor is this the end of it. Dr Singh’s government cannot survive an hour without the support of Mulayam Singh Yadav and Mayawati.

Neither wants ministers in the Singh cabinet. Reluctant allies have postponed a September reshuffle to an October one, or perhaps dragged the process into November. Spare a thought for those hopefuls who have ordered new suits for a swearing-in ceremony.

Poor chaps. This means six weeks less of swagger in an already curtailed tenure.

That is the crux of the problem: time has run out. Everyone has already feasted at the bloated table of government. The next lot of ministers is being invited to coffee at the end of the meal, and it tastes bitter. Moreover, they will be asked, at election time, to share the tab for the whole meal although all they have tasted is coffee.

Dr Manmohan Singh’s political career began when he was selected in 1991 by Rao to be a part of the solution; he succeeded because he was not part of the problem. He does not have that alibi in 2012.

After having been in power for more than eight years, Congress cannot blame others for corruption and inflation, the twin poles of looming disaster.

Turning Mamata Banerjee into a culprit simply does not wash; she had enough MPs to object but never enough to bring down the government. If Congress believed that it could have averted an economic crisis by taking certain decisions, they could have been taken two years ago.

Moreover, Mamata Banerjee never stopped this government from bringing down prices or sending the police into the homes and offices of coal block scam artists.

When your shop is empty during a Diwali sale, then you surely must understand that your sell-by date is over.

The writer is editor of The Sunday Guardian, published from Delhi, India on Sunday, published from London and editorial director, India Today and Headlines Today.


Do you have information you wish to share with Dawn.com? You can email our News Desk to share news tips, reports and general feedback. You can also email the Blog Desk if you have an opinion or narrative to share, or reach out to the Special Projects Desk to send us your Photos, or Videos.

More From This Section

A day of shame

The government’s inertia has pushed matters to where they stand today.

The cancer of ‘sifarish’

The almost universal practice of ‘sifarish’ does not raise any eyebrows and has become an accepted social norm.

What next?

There are long-pending issues to be resolved by India and Pakistan.

Comments (2) (Closed)


parvez the great
Oct 01, 2012 03:17am
"It is well known in political circles that Rao did not waste too much morality on politics. His priorities were different. At the top came what was useful to him; second place went to what was good for the country." Oh! is that the reason why Sonia chrony Arjun made Rao's life very difficult through continuous kicks in the rear?
h.mani
Sep 30, 2012 02:25pm
P.V.Narsimha Rao,in fact was best P.M. India ever had,He shines when compared to many better known Premiers,but he was not Nehru/Gandhi/ or a politicians from cow belt.He was a pragamatic,practical and very shrewed politicians who knew how the system works,that is dangling guddies to greedy politicians who had no higher value other than filling their own bank account.Tell me one policy which has made a little difference to the well being of Indian people,most numbers?The answer is 1991 decision to go away from failed policies of past,only a non Nehru/gandhi could have done it,but the Congress has done utmost behind babari Mujid to defame and discridit him,it also help glorify and hide the failures of dynastic rulers of India,but they do not fool people like Mr Akbar or me.Thank you for your insightful column,you rarely disappoint your readers,thanks Dawn.Nice day