Tax amnesty

Published Sep 28, 2012 12:05am

THE Federal Board of Revenue’s proposed tax amnesty scheme to lure 3.8 million tax thieves into declaring their ‘hidden’ wealth at home and abroad is unlikely to produce the intended results. Slated to be launched next month, it doesn’t appear to be the right route to increasing revenues and expanding the tax base. If the past is anything to go by, the scheme can at best allow tax dodgers to launder their ill-gotten assets by paying a nominal tax on their value at an official gain of a few million rupees. The government is living off heavy bank loans and foreign dole, but the cost that will go into raising such a meagre amount for the economy will be formidable. As is usual, the opportunity will tempt more people, including many honest taxpayers, to cheat the government in the hope of availing another amnesty a few years down the road. This is not how governments can or should increase their revenues. The proposal only indicates a lack of political will to take tough decisions. A government that dithered on its commitment to implement value added tax for fear of a political backlash hardly inspires confidence about its ability to document the economy to boost the tax-to-GDP ratio of less than 10 per cent, the lowest in the region.

The FBR proposal is reflective of the unwillingness of the tax collectors to bring to justice those who avoid paying taxes. Against tall claims by successive heads of the board, the number of people filing tax returns has dropped sharply and more than two-thirds of the government revenue is generated from inflationary, indirect taxes. In the budget for the last fiscal, the government had promised to bring 700,000 wealthy people into the net. More than a year later, the scheme has fizzled out. To improve its revenue collection, the government will have to tax all incomes irrespective of source and revamp tax administration. Amnesty and whitening schemes will only further entrench the culture of tax evasion in the country.


Do you have information you wish to share with Dawn.com? You can email our News Desk to share news tips, reports and general feedback. You can also email the Blog Desk if you have an opinion or narrative to share, or reach out to the Special Projects Desk to send us your Photos, or Videos.

More From This Section

Rock and a hard place

The reason why the police turned their ire on journalists as Islamabad descended into chaos is not hard to understand.

Endangered temple

The white stripe on the national flag designed to represent Pakistan’s numerous minority-religion groups is ignored.

Comments (5) (Closed)


Iftikhar Husain
Sep 28, 2012 11:20am
Tax collection must start from top rich people because they can afford to pay. I agree with the contents of the editorial.
Mateen Asif
Sep 28, 2012 06:07am
It will only benefit black sheep, and the intended results would never be achieved, Agreeing to the content of editorial, the plans gonna backfire.
Ijaz
Sep 28, 2012 06:03am
I strongly endorse the views of the Editor. undoubtedly such amnesty which encourage and induce all those who are already searching for such loops in our tax system to avoid tax. Further, unflinching stand of Government should be to pursue such tax evader with iron-hand, with no such sign of weakness. This weakness will not encourage such tax evaders but also frustrates all tax-payers.
shahidanwar
Sep 28, 2012 03:49am
Spot on!
ROHIT PANDEY
Sep 29, 2012 02:41am
About 30 years ago,when tax rates were very high in India....the tax authorities followed almost the same route of enticement.it did not work. Around a decade ago,India introduced something called PAN ID ..permanent account number on photo ID card.Any big transaction requires the show of this ID card.Along with lowering of tax rates the enforcement of the use of the ID card has brought down tax evasion to a large extent. Direct taxes in India fetch a lot more than Indirect Taxes. Wonder why Pakistan,a country which is based on "Islamic values" which according to believers has not match in the world should have such a large tax dodging population and the country is dependent on US aid to bankroll the expenses of running a state and a country?