The assault on coexistence

Published Sep 23, 2012 02:16am

WHAT is common between the criminal complaint against Rabbi David Goldberg for circumcising Jewish boys in Hof, Germany; the ban on minarets in Switzerland; the continual attempts by some European publications to offend Muslims; the attempt to convict a young Christian in Pakistan for blasphemy she did not commit; an attack on a mosque in Missouri, US; or, most vicious of all, the recent film that injects lies and malice into public discourse through veins nourished by hatred?

Each one is not designed to destroy the existence of the ‘other’. Their purpose is to poison coexistence, the fundamental basis of civilised living. Anger is not always illogical, but there is no rationale that can justify each of these instances.

Rabbi Goldberg was not trying to circumcise Christians; he was practising his own faith. To target minarets as a cultural crime in an age of skyscrapers is manifest prejudice, of the sillier sort.

Provocative European publishers are not defending freedom of speech, which is their much-advertised explanation, since nowhere in the democratic world does the right to publish include the leeway to libel or defame, particularly when a lie can lead to public disorder.

The Pakistani child was a victim, not a perpetrator — of fanatics who wanted to punish her and her kin for protecting Christianity in their theocratic environment.

The bilious film about the Prophet of Islam (PBUH)was not made by a filmmaker, but by a bigot determined to provoke a violent reaction that would confirm in many innocent or naïve minds the image of Islam as a fountainhead of violence rather than what the word actually means, which is peace. The barbarians who killed four American diplomats in Libya duly obliged: hatred breeds hatred in an escalating cycle.

Even the most dramatic example of pure, unadulterated terrorism, the destruction of New York’s twin towers on 9/11, was initiated not to destroy America’s existence, which is impossible even within the mindset of a maniac, but to breach an emerging international order founded on mutual respect, and the equality of nations.

The planes that headed towards the White House and Pentagon were not ferrying troops who had been ordered to conquer Washington. Their purpose was to generate fear, hostility and war between the two largest religious communities in the world.

They succeeded, but to an extent far lower than the expectations of terrorist masterminds, and yet far more than the young 21st century could stomach.

The price has been high. The Mumbai terrorist attacks in November 2008 had a dual objective: to warp the India-Pakistan engagement, as fragile as it might have been; and to incite violence in India between Hindus and Muslims. It is satisfying to report that the second wish failed spectacularly because Indians understood that such discord would mean a victory for terrorism.

The most interesting aspect of this worldwide shadow war is that both the self-appointed commanders and their terrorist troops are almost wholly civilian. We are witnessing a rare phenomenon: people outside the power structure, working largely (but not always) on their own, can do more damage to social harmony than powerful regiments led by dictators, presidents or prime ministers.

There are governments, of course, who are tempted to dip their hands in the sewer for political gain; and you can never rule out the unintelligent intelligence agency which believes in a strategy of destabilising civilian populations. But governments have not, exceptions apart, been in the forefront of these battle lines.

Whatever their nature, despotic, democratic or in-between, governments know that fomenting terrorism debilitates the personal and institutional advantages of being in power through blowback damage. Even when legitimate armies are put on the field, governments calibrate the conflict.

When governments fall into the grip of radical ideologues who have left common sense at the club bathhouse, the damage is startling, as was evident during president George Bush’s Iraq war.

The most dangerous of today’s conspiracies are being manufactured in small rooms lost in the labyrinths of a big city by men who will not become internationally infamous unless they succeed. We do not know how many 9/11s or Mumbai attacks have failed, but just the thought is sufficient for a shudder.

Failure is not any hindrance to fanatics. They are now being lured by the siren outreach of a miraculous technology that continues to breed new tools by the day. Prevention is the full-time job of innumerable police forces, while no one has any real clue about what might constitute a cure.

This war has to be fought where it is being incubated, on the street, and in the mind. We cannot afford politicians who seek votes from a sewer. This is a malaise, an infection, a plague, a crisis that demands leaders who maintain the sanity of good doctors in the face of havoc. Violence can begin with a word, and every word must be chosen with care.

The writer is editor of The Sunday Guardian, published from Delhi, India on Sunday, published from London and editorial director, India Today and Headlines Today.


Do you have information you wish to share with Dawn.com? You can email our News Desk to share news tips, reports and general feedback. You can also email the Blog Desk if you have an opinion or narrative to share, or reach out to the Special Projects Desk to send us your Photos, or Videos.

More From This Section

Overhaul the system

Whereas the thin upper stratum thrives, the poor are pushed out of the ambit of development.

Comments (10) (Closed)


girna
Sep 23, 2012 09:00am
As a respected journalist , I agree with his view . But one thing is clear from these things .Those who try to foment hatred are mentally mature ,though evil minded and those who are being moved by the sentiments are mentally immature.These anger and violence will burn the Islamic world eventually . These evil techniques were deployed by British and french to rule the world , but the Islamic world hasn't learned any thing .Not a single Islamic country is self sufficient today . When statues of Buddha were being bombarded , not a single Buddhist country like Japan or Korea or Thailand protested like the ones Islamic countries did .Their faith still exists ,perhaps increased ,because they know faith can't be erased by bombs . Muslims should emulate them and Education is needed .
Djali
Sep 23, 2012 06:00am
Making a film solely for the purpose of mocking is reprehensible. Equally reprehensible is the offensive role played by Egyptian media which got the movie translated into Arabic and gave it a wide publicity. It is as if they were itching for a fight. If only the Egyptian provocateurs had not done this equally reprehensible thing, Islam could have had a chance to claim that it stands for peace. For non-muslims today, this incident reinforces the utter failure of Islam to rein in its fanatical followers. During the Dutch cartoon controversy too, "ambassadors" of 40 muslim countries had circulated a padded file of (many unrelated to the offending Danish newspaper) cartoons during the annual OIC meeting, exactly playing the role now being played by the Egyptian media. Akbar, can you condemn these equally reprehensible acts? If not, you are one of them, the fanatics, who see only one side. -djali
Neer Nayan
Sep 23, 2012 06:39pm
Good!
Ziggy
Sep 23, 2012 02:30pm
What a completely disjointed article. You need to be a cryptographer to make any sense of this authors writings. While his overall statements may be true, someone needs to tell him to stop using so many cliche's and state his point concisely and clearly.
Khalid
Sep 23, 2012 01:26pm
If we don't learn to co-exist ,we might not exist at all, present day technology have brought us so close that we can not ignore each other, we must respect the small differences and celibate the common heritage of humans.
Ganesh (India)
Sep 23, 2012 01:55pm
Superb analysis by Akbar ji... Only writer's of his intellect, wit, insight can come up with such deeply thoughtfull article...
sb
Sep 24, 2012 12:38am
That's a very good point.
sheikh siddeeque. USA
Sep 23, 2012 05:14pm
As always MJA is at his supreme excellence.
Yogesh
Sep 23, 2012 10:35am
M J Akbar is simply gr8. Excellant !!! His cristal clear intelect and thought is reflected in this reflected in this article.
B R Chawla
Sep 23, 2012 03:01pm
M J you always excel in tour judgment and analysis. Chawla