Syrian vortex

Published Aug 11, 2012 12:10am

THE foreign minister’s statement at the Tehran meeting on Syria symbolises Pakistan’s dilemma — the tightrope walking Islamabad has to do on an issue in which it finds its friends and allies divided. Foreign Minister Khar said Islamabad was opposed to foreign intervention in Syria because that would complicate a situation “already very complex”. She was also “disturbed” over reports that Al Qaeda was infiltrating Syria. Open to various interpretations, her speech could be construed as supportive of an authoritarian regime whose crackdown on democracy protesters has so far led to over 20,000 fatalities in a 17-month-old conflict. But more likely, the foreign minister’s stand was rooted in Pakistan’s traditional opposition to foreign intervention in a country’s internal affairs. To that extent, Ms Khar’s speech was a reiteration of this country’s long-standing approach to foreign interventions: discourage them as much as possible and wherever possible, with the unspoken fear in the background being that perhaps too much international adventurism could one day lead to Pakistan itself being caught in the international cross-hairs.

Beyond that, Ms Khar’s statement was a disappointment. The savage crackdown by the Assad regime against the Syrian rebels ought to have drawn greater censure. Instead, all Foreign Minister Khar offered was this: “We would urge both the Syrian government and the opposition groups to exercise restraint for the safety and security of the civilian population.” Perhaps in deciding to stick to its long-standing policy of non-intervention and non-interference, the foreign ministry calculated that condemnation of the Assad regime would undercut Pakistan’s other, more central message. The problem is that a Syrian policy has to be located in Pakistan’s other interests. To stand in Tehran and tacitly express support for a Syrian regime whose struggle against its people has also taken a sectarian — Shia vs Sunni — hue is to be tone-deaf to the dangerous faultlines that exist in the region.

Since petrodollars and the Iranian revolution turbo-charged the Shia-Sunni rivalry between Iran and Saudi Arabia, Pakistan has played a delicate game: stay on the right side of the powerful and rich Saudi monarchy, while also acknowledging the reality of a shared border with Iran. In the Syrian case, the lines have been firmly drawn in the Persian-Arab rivalry: Iran supporting the Assad regime; Saudi Arabia backing the rebels. So while trying to show some leadership in the Muslim world or just trying to reiterate Pakistan’s traditional foreign-policy stance, the foreign ministry must be careful to not get sucked into the Syrian vortex. President Assad may soon be consigned to the dustbin of history; Pakistan will still have to deal with both Iran and Saudi Arabia.


Do you have information you wish to share with Dawn.com? You can email our News Desk to share news tips, reports and general feedback. You can also email the Blog Desk if you have an opinion or narrative to share, or reach out to the Special Projects Desk to send us your Photos, or Videos.

More From This Section

Army chief’s US visit

GEN Raheel Sharif’s visit to the US has been dubbed a success in several quarters, but in truth little is really...

Melting glaciers

A NEW study has drawn attention to the accelerating rate of glacial melt in Pakistan’s mountainous north. The...

Acid attacks on the rise

IF there ever was a situation that could aptly be described without a trace of irony as a fate worse than death, it...

Comments (6) Closed




cautious
Aug 11, 2012 10:00am
Pakistan reminds me a bit of the Palestinians -- never miss an opportunity to make a dumb move. Supporting a brutal Dictator who's on the way out gets Pakistan what? If Khar thought this was a sophisticated move to keep Pakistan neutral - think again.
Musawar
Aug 11, 2012 09:29am
yes Pakistan needs to underlines its core strategic foriegn policy dosses. Both in short-term and long-term percpectives...
U M
Aug 11, 2012 02:01pm
Excellent !
Abdus Salam Khan
Aug 11, 2012 09:53pm
Pakistan would be well-adivsed to avoid such confrerences altogether. Its own house is on fire, so it cannot and should not act as an international fire-fighter.
S. A. M.
Aug 11, 2012 10:01pm
The statement of Lady Khar is exceptionally a very wise one. What is required is to understand the subtlety of the situation. I think once you read it carefully it is not very difficult to discern the direction that Pakistan is heading which I believe is the correct one. Today's its their turn tomorrow could be ours as well.
Alras
Aug 12, 2012 05:35pm
Unfortunately you are also Promoting sectarianism what the enemies of Islam desire. An ill informed and biased general-ism which is influenced from reports from Zionist controlled Western media. Not expected from a responsible paper like Dawn.