THIS is apropos the articles, ‘The Rohingya and Pakistan’ by Huma Yusuf, ‘Karma and killings’ by Irfan Husain and the letter, ‘Persecution of Muslims in Myanmar’ by Naseem Ahmed.

Ms Huma’s stance is that the debate about how Pakistanis should react to the killings of the Rohingya has pitted liberals against conservatives. She alleged that the quick appropriation of an ‘us versus them’ narrative of (Rohingya) Muslim victimisation betrays the political opportunism of Pakistan’s right-wing parties and the easy use of religion as a way to claim moral high ground.

One would point out that defending the Muslims’ causes all over the world is not a new phenomenon for the local adherents of Islam or limited to religious parties. Remember the Khilafat Movement of the pre - partition era when the subcontinental Muslims had wholeheartedly espoused the cause of their Turkish brethren? The Turkish leaders and citizens to this day recall fondly how even the women over here had participated by donating their jewelry.

Then there’s been the Palestinian issue, followed by Bosnian and Chechen crises and the Kosovo problem. The Pakistanis have been helping morally, diplomatically and, where necessary, materially, the oppressed Muslims in these places. Most Pakistani Muslims and I myself have always sympathised with or helped such causes. However, I am advocating diplomatic effort, not jihad, for the Rohingya issue.

Regarding the criticism that why are the domestic or non - Muslims’ problems not receiving the same amount of attention as the external ones, a simple example would clarify. If there’s a large family with many siblings living in one home and there is a quarrel between two of them, some of the siblings might try to help resolve it while others may remain aloof. But if a group of outsiders attacks the duo, then all or most of them are likely to come to their rescue.

Irfan Husain has also observed that it’s very human to be selective in our sympathy: with all the suffering globally, it would take a saint to grieve equally for all.

Ms Yusuf then cited Dr Ayesha Siddiqa as saying no one is willing to remember that tensions between the Rohingya and the Myanmar state aren’t related to religion but to questions of statehood and territory.

If the Rohingya had been Buddhists, would they still be restricted to having no more than two children or require state permission to marry? Or, would they have been subjected to widespread killings, torture and rape, forcing 200,000 to flee to Bangaldesh in 1978 and 250,000 in 1991 - 92, as noted in Mr. Ahmed’s letter?

Pakistan, despite poverty and many other difficulties, is still hosting 2.5 million Afghans, besides nearly three million Bangladeshi and other economic migrants. The Myanmar people must have a heart and treat the Rohingya fairly.

ABDUL RASHID Karachi

More From This Section

Foreign intelligence intervention

SPEAKING to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee about unrest in parts of eastern Ukraine, US Secretary of State...

FCR: Fata woes

THE tribal people are controlled under the black law known as the Frontier Crimes Regulation (FCR). The tribal ...

Draft labour policy

APROPOS the news report ‘Anomalies in labour policy draft pointed out’ (April 11), it is mentioned: “It...

Hazardous cooking oil

THIS is apropos the reports ‘Import of hazardous cooking oil’ (April 11) and ‘China, India face huge cancer...


Comments are closed.

Comments (10)

Noon
August 11, 2012 3:53 am
I see your point and I do sympathize with the Rohingya community, however, where are these same people when the Hazara Community is targeted in Quetta and the Ahmadi's in Punjab. Also, there is an area in Karachi called Burmese Colony where the same Rohingya community has been living for decades, with no proper documentation and lacking basic needs of life the entire area is using illegal means for electricity connection, should we accomodate these people first before trying to help others.
Sheeraz Nizamani
August 11, 2012 7:19 am
No one is taking action against them? everyone is silent, both islam and British Media , what's the reason behind it?
gfellow
August 11, 2012 3:40 pm
There are over a billion muslims in the world. Why is that all the readers point to the western world to take action in these kinds of situations.
Waqas
August 11, 2012 5:21 pm
@Sheeraz- unfortunately nobody cares. 1 white man's life is worth 20,000 muslims - its the way it has always been and always will remain the same.
MKH
August 11, 2012 6:00 pm
You tell us?
Shakeel
August 11, 2012 7:41 pm
Thing happening to Rohingyas is inhuman. But I fail to understand why Pakistanis are showing unnecessary emotional response. In our own country, 40000 have died in last decades in militant attacks. Relegious and sectarian minorities are persecuted and blatantly killed ( remember burning of christian villages in Gojra and execution style killing of Shias in Kohistan). Not to mention killing bouts in Karachi with private militias and political mafias killing hundreds in a single day. And we Pakistanis are shedding our tears for Rohingyas. Reading a Pakistani mind is a thesis in twisted logic and misplaced concerns
Saad
August 11, 2012 8:45 pm
What about Shia, Ahamadi, Hindu, Christians in Pakistan? Don't your pious heart bleed for us?
mohammad
August 11, 2012 10:17 pm
very well written article. dear abdul rashid , love this write up. exactly composed. keep it up. why is world silent on this issue.
shahid
August 12, 2012 12:31 am
i am amazed to see on the best and an eye opener article by someone in the past one decade. having one comment so far can tell you how much this article has caused irritation in the liberal anti islam readers of Dawn newspaper. well done. the cause of Pakistan has lost but its going to reborn once again. Islamic state of Pakistan
dr vimal raina
August 12, 2012 2:52 am
Sheeraz, you should know a strange thing that happened in Myanmar when a floods hit that country six months back. In a normal country in floods you are supposed to evacuate people who are threatened or are in the spate. Not in Myanmar. The order there was to stay where you are and do not create a refugee problem. Army was deployed to oversee that the people did not migrate. There was no Muslim or Bhuddhist angle to that problem. The whole world has been trying to reason things out with Myanmar but to no avail. It was only diplomacy that can solve the problem as it did to bring a shade of democracy back. Shouting at them will make them more unreasonable. The leverage has to be both diplomatic and economical.
Explore: Indian elections 2014
Explore: Indian elections 2014
How much do you know about Indian Elections?
How much do you know about Indian Elections?
Cartoons
E-PAPER
Front Page