The Washington Diary

Published Dec 20, 2011 07:53am

US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s holiday reception was one of those occasions where all is not said. Some subjects are left unspoken for others to feel and draw their conclusions.

Pakistan was one such subject. Secretary Clinton stayed with her guests for more than two hours, meeting them individually and in groups. With some, she had brief formal chats. Others tried to engage her in longish discussions about subjects not usually discussed at such receptions and were politely dissuaded by her staff.

She did express good wishes for the Pakistani people, hoping that they will overcome their problems and come out stronger from the present crisis. She also mentioned the “extraordinary love and affection” Pakistanis around the world had for their country.

Taking cue from her, other US officials in the room also avoided commenting on the current situation in Pakistan or on US-Pakistan relations, which said a lot about the state of these relations.

Last year and the year before, Secretary Clinton and her staff were full of warmth and affection for Pakistan and its people. This warmth seems to have been replaced by concerns about Pakistan and its relations with the United States, although neither Secretary Clinton nor any other State Department official said so.

But most of the guests were private citizens, either members of the State Department press corps or former officials. They obviously did not have to be as careful as the secretary or her staff.

-Photo by author

“I wish your politicians, generals and other rich Pakistanis had half of the love that ordinary Pakistanis do for their country,” said a journalist who has visited almost all major cities in Pakistan.

“I just do not understand how they justify not paying their taxes. Don’t they have a conscience?” asked another, who works for the financial wire of an international news agency.

And then came the question that every non-official guest at the party asked this correspondent: “Where do you see this relationship (US-Pakistan) going?”

Some waited for an answer. Others provided their own. “It is not going anywhere,” was the most common response.

“But it is not going away either,” I countered.

“Well, yes, but it is as good as dead,” said an Arab journalist.

And then came the icing on the cake, “hey enemy,” shouted an American journalist and an old friend as she saw me.

“Hey, I was just joking,” she added as she noticed a bewildered look on my face. “But relations are bad, right?” Another guest changed the subject. “Your media, what is wrong with it?” she asked. “They love half-cooked, sensational stories and they love to hate America.”

And this was a common complaint. Almost all agreed that the Pakistani media was not only irresponsible but “also vicious,” as a guest suggested.

So I had to defend even those I did not want to. “Not true. Not all are vicious or irresponsible,” I said. “We are not used to freedom, so we are still learning the ropes.”

“Be careful. You may get boxed in while learning the ropes,” said a guest as others laughed.

“What is happening to President Zardari,” asked a friend, realising that the discussion on the media was embarrassing me. “They are being unfair to him and the prime minister,” he added.

“Who are they?” asked a guest.

“The army, the judiciary and the media,” came the reply.

And this too was a general feeling.

It seemed that most people in the room saw the Memogate scandal in the context of Pakistan’s political history, which is full of military takeovers and incompetent civilian rulers.

“Corrupt, he is. Nobody in Washington doubts that,” said a member of the State Department press corps. “But he is also an elected president. It’s about time you end this game. Let him complete his tenure and elect a new government when the time comes.”

“But many in Pakistan feel that this government is so corrupt that there may not be another chance. It may cause the boat to capsise,” said another journalist who also had visited Pakistan. “He probably is the most unpopular president in the country’s history.”

“May be. But they need to have a device within the system to deal with such things. There cannot, and should not, be another military takeover,” said the guest who started the Memogate discussion.

And nobody in the audience could explain why Mansoor Ijaz, the Pakistani-American businessman who started the Memogate scandal, went public with what he claims was a secret mission. Almost all also felt that whatever he says should be taken with a pinch of salt.

But one person who remained unmentioned throughout the evening was Pakistan’s former ambassador, Husain Haqqani. It seemed as if Washington had already forgotten him and moved ahead.

 

The author is a correspondent for Dawn, based in Washington, DC.


Anwar Iqbal is a correspondent for Dawn, based in Washington, DC.


The views expressed by this blogger and in the following reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Dawn Media Group.

More From This Author

Comments (9) (Closed)


raika45
Dec 20, 2011 04:56pm
Whatever your relations with America.Good or bad.It has it's ups and downs.The frank truth is that you need American aid.So ultimately compromises will be made.
malik
Dec 20, 2011 07:26pm
No,Raika, we do not need Americas aid. We are not beggars and this philosophy is killing us and making us an obese,morally corrupt and we are devouring ourselves to be better servants. Its people like you who have subservient tendencies and misery loves company. Are we not better than the "master race".
Anwar Iqbal
Dec 20, 2011 08:10pm
Comments posted on my Facebook: Mohsen Bashir: There is so much, not said , or maybe hidden ... 48 minutes ago · Like Naeem Malik: Kuch bhi naa kahaa aur keh bhi gai 45 minutes ago · Like Enver Masud: On the very day that Hillary Clinton was talking about Internet freedom, our email server was blacklisted causing our Internet Service Provider for 15 years to request that we stop sending bulk emails to our readers. As a nonprofit organization, we are NOT subject to the "SPAM Act," but we follow it anyway. 41 minutes ago · Like Islam Afridi Anwar Lala:...The Answer to a question abt TAX payment is simple by a common Pakistani..If I know,My Tax is going to the pocket of thugs in Islamabad and lavish life style of my so called democratic leaders,I will try to cheat by every means to escape...I would pay to a charity instead of those thieves..
parveez uk
Dec 21, 2011 04:21am
Aid, aid, aid that is all I hear. The point is the amount of aid that is spent on the man in the street, is peanut, and that we can do with out. At least we can do what we want, and not what the USA want us to do.
TU Khan
Dec 21, 2011 09:17am
Sounds like Anwar Iqbal faced really tough questions. They (journalists) were just trying to make you fail. Nobody has answers for those questions-so take it easy. It is really hard to fix all those problems.
Bharat
Dec 21, 2011 10:16am
It seems that if relations have deteriorated so much, then the trend is irreversible. It also seems that, slowly, over the next few years Pakistan will replace North Korea as the most Isoltaed state in the world,.
kiranbabu naidu
Dec 21, 2011 06:20pm
why pakistanis cant understand ,,,,,,,,,,,,aid not for people,,,,,,,,,
Lakhkar Khan
Dec 21, 2011 07:50pm
Maybe the stopping of aid flow is a way to go. It goes towards the corrupt politicians anyway. Average Pakistani is not benefiting from any assistance. Stop the aid and keep it that way.
radhakrishnan
Dec 21, 2011 08:16pm
No country can be built on the quick sand of hatred& fair weather friends.Pkistan's place is in southeast asia &not in arabian penisula.Living in amity with neighbours is in the interest of all.We need leaders with vision to achieve this.