Govt comments sought in Atlantique case

Published
0

LAHORE, July 16: A Lahore High Court appellate bench sought comments from the federal law secretary and the attorney-general within a month about the processing of the Atlantique case for filing before the International Court of Justice.

Atlantique, a Pakistan Navy reconnaissance plane, was shot down by India over the international border without warning in August 1999. All 16 navy personnel aboard were killed.

The Nawaz Sharif government decided to agitate the matter before the ICJ and the then law federal law minister, Khalid Anwer, did the groundwork. Aziz A Munshi, the military government’s (former) attorney-general, actively pursued the matter and pleaded the case before the ICJ, which dismissed it after preliminary hearing.

According to Advocate MD Tahir, the government spent over Rs24.32 million on the preparation of the case and the fees of the AG and other lawyers. He questioned the waste of public funds on a case that was not maintainable before the ICJ and moved a petition in the Lahore High Court.

Justice Malik Muhammad Qayyum, since retired, dismissed the petition, saying that the money was well spent as the proceedings also projected the Kashmir issue. He praised the legal acumen of Mr Munshi and Syed Sharifuddin Pirzada, the then federal law minister, who represented Pakistan as ad hoc judge of the ICJ at the Hague.

Mr Tahir challenged the dismissal by an intra-court appeal, which came up for hearing before a division bench comprising Justices M Javed Buttar and Jamshed Ali Shah. The impugned order, the lawyer said, skirted round the main issue. He claimed that Indian AG Soli Sorabji received a sum of Rs500,000 for the same assignment and even this amount was objected to by the Indian law minister, who resigned in protest.

The bench asked Deputy Attorney-General Sher Zaman Khan to obtain comprehensive replies to the averments made by the appellant in his pleadings from the offices of the federal law secretary and the attorney-general within a month, following which the appeal would be fixed for regular hearing.

Opinion

Editorial

Debt that stays
30 Jul, 2026

Debt that stays

THE power sector’s circular debt grew by Rs61bn in the last fiscal year, taking the total to roughly Rs1.67tr from...
HIV warning
30 Jul, 2026

HIV warning

THE HIV infections detected around two SESSI-run hospitals in Karachi demand far more than another hurried committee...
End trafficking
30 Jul, 2026

End trafficking

MODERN slavery, in the form of human trafficking, is among the state’s gravest failures. Scores of Pakistanis are...
AJK elections
29 Jul, 2026

AJK elections

CONSIDERING the political unrest that has rocked Azad Jammu and Kashmir in the recent past, free and fair general...
Still vulnerable
29 Jul, 2026

Still vulnerable

THE State Bank’s decision to hold the policy rate at 11.5pc is a prudent response to the heightened risks the...
Guarding the past
29 Jul, 2026

Guarding the past

THE return of 513 smuggled archaeological artefacts from the US is a welcome homecoming for objects that should ...