US to coordinate Afghan adjustments with Nato

Published March 19, 2019
Zalmay Khalilzad's assurance follows reports of Nato allies' upset with US for not involving them in Afghan peace process. ─ AP/File
Zalmay Khalilzad's assurance follows reports of Nato allies' upset with US for not involving them in Afghan peace process. ─ AP/File

WASHINGTON: The United States will coordinate adjustments in its presence in Afghanistan with its Nato allies, says US special representative Zalmay Khalilzad.

The assurance follows media reports that Nato allies were upset with Washington for not involving them in the Afghan peace process, which includes a series of meetings between US and Taliban representatives in Doha, Qatar.

Mr Khalilzad, the US special envoy for Afghanistan reconciliation, heads the American team in these negotiations.

The reports claimed that at a recent meeting in Kabul Nato and other European allies were particularly upset with the presence of Qatari diplomats in the talks. They argued that if Qatar could be included in the meetings because it was hosting the talks why those who have contributed troops to the US-led international force in Afghanistan were ignored.

“Working closely with Nato and other partners and allies has been a priority from day one. We came together. We will coordinate adjustments in our presence together,” Mr Khalilzad tweeted. “And if we leave, we will leave together. Together for peace and security for Afghanistan and for us all,” he added.

Mr Khalilzad, who returned to Wa­­shington last week after the fifth round of US-Taliban talks in Doha, said in another tweet that the negotiations were moving in the right direction.

He said that since his return from Doha, he has briefed US governments leaders and “many others” about the Afghan Peace Process, including Spe­cial Representative of the Secretary-General for the United Nations Assis­tance Mission in Afghanistan Tada­michi Yamamoto, Indian Foreign Sec­retary Vijay Gokhale and Norwegian Deputy Foreign Minister Audun Halvorsen.

Since his return from Doha, Mr Khalilzad has faced severe criticism for not including the Afghan government in the talks. Last week Afghan National Security Adviser Hamdullah Mohib accused Mr Khalilzad of “delegitimising” the Kabul government by excluding it from deliberations.

He also claimed that Mr Khalilzad wanted to be “the viceroy” of Afghanistan.

The Trump administration reacted strongly to Mr Mohib’s statement and summoned him to the State Department to register its protest. US National Security Adviser John Bolton cancelled his meeting with Mr Mohib while the US media reported that Washington may refuse to give Mr Mohib visa for future visits, even though he has an American wife.

Media reports indicate that Mr Khalilzad repeatedly asked the Taliban to allow Afghan government representatives to participate in the talks but the insurgents have refused to hold direct talks with Kabul. The Afghan government argues that the US should also stay out of the talks that do not involve Kabul.

Published in Dawn, March 19th, 2019

Opinion

Editorial

Weathering the storm
Updated 29 Apr, 2024

Weathering the storm

Let 2024 be the year when we all proactively ensure that our communities are safeguarded and that the future is secure against the inevitable next storm.
Afghan repatriation
29 Apr, 2024

Afghan repatriation

COMPARED to the roughshod manner in which the caretaker set-up dealt with the issue, the elected government seems a...
Trying harder
29 Apr, 2024

Trying harder

IT is a relief that Pakistan managed to salvage some pride. Pakistan had taken the lead, then fell behind before...
Return to the helm
Updated 28 Apr, 2024

Return to the helm

With Nawaz Sharif as PML-N president, will we see more grievances being aired?
Unvaxxed & vulnerable
Updated 28 Apr, 2024

Unvaxxed & vulnerable

Even deadly mosquito-borne illnesses like dengue and malaria have vaccines, but they are virtually unheard of in Pakistan.
Gaza’s hell
Updated 28 Apr, 2024

Gaza’s hell

Perhaps Western ‘statesmen’ may moderate their policies if a significant percentage of voters punish them at the ballot box.