FESTIVAL:Orwell, again

Published February 28, 2016

By Zahra Gardezi

ERIC Arthur Blair — who wrote under the pen name George Orwell — is an undeniably relevant author, even today. Orwell’s social commentary and witty, sometimes caustic, remarks launched him into sight of not only those disillusioned by the counter-narrative, but also to a larger audience hungry for his tales. Joining the discussion with Navid Shahzad and Mohammed Hanif was Orwell’s adopted son, Richard Blair, in the session ‘Life With my Father, George Orwell.’ Blair recalled Orwell’s much-quoted saying, “freedom is the right to tell people what they do not want to hear”, and the freedom to say that which is right. During the days of the Spanish Civil War, the British intelligensia and Orwell travelled to Spain: the intelligensia group came back with a blank report, and Orwell came back with a narrative, which he published as Homage to Catalonia.

Orwell’s aim as an “old-fashioned socialist”, recalled Blair, was to expose that “the government is lying to [the listener]”. The Spanish government seemed to have suffered from selective amnesia regarding the Civil War, and by that quotient Orwell stood as the victor.

Shahzad related this selective amnesia to East Pakistan and the creation of Bangladesh as remembered by Pakistanis now. Hanif recalled the narrative of Partition: trains from Amritsar carrying corpses sent over to Pakistan, and commented that we often ‘forget’ that the same was the case from Lahore to Amritsar. Shahzad brought to light the question bound to arise next: “How much reporting is by people who were actually on the spot?” Hanif also questioned the reality of reporting: “We could argue what war is, how it is, but has anyone seen this war?” According to him, journalists often wait until someone tells them what happened to analyse and report it.

It is equally important to remember that one must be careful about what he or she remembers, said Blair. One such problem arose in constructing the political introduction to Orwell’s notable work Animal Farm, in which criticising the left could have had consequences. The political, satirical novella was also initially problematic to publicise: renowned British-American essayist, author and publisher T.S. Eliot refused to publish Animal Farm because of its Russian links.

Shahzad recalled that throughout her schooling, Orwell had been considered as a dark writer, which was not the complete picture. Orwell had a peculiar sense of humour that featured in his works. One such seemingly simple essay of his is ‘A Nice Cup of Tea’. Orwell’s works — especially one of his most famous novels, 1984, remain pertinent today, for their intellectual honesty and social commentary.

Opinion

Editorial

Sustainable path?
Updated 13 Jun, 2026

Sustainable path?

The FY27 budget is the first clear signal that the government is ready to transition from stabilisation to growth.
Prioritising education
13 Jun, 2026

Prioritising education

THOUGH the improvement in the country’s literacy rate may be slight, as highlighted by the Economic Survey, it ...
Poverty’s rise
13 Jun, 2026

Poverty’s rise

AS attention turns to the government’s plans for the coming fiscal year, one set of figures deserves particular...
A difficult story
Updated 12 Jun, 2026

A difficult story

Unless productivity becomes the dominant target of economic policy, Pakistan will continue to oscillate between crises and fragile recovery.
Rough waters
12 Jun, 2026

Rough waters

AMONGST the key potential triggers for fresh conflict in South Asia is water. The Indian state is behaving in an...
Politicised football
12 Jun, 2026

Politicised football

ALMOST three-and-half years since Lionel Messi led Argentina to FIFA World Cup glory, the latest edition of...