Insensitive comments

Published January 18, 2016

WHEN faced with crises, proactive governments go into damage-control mode and react with a mix of empathy and spin, projecting an image of concern. However, the PPP-led Sindh government prefers to deal with crises in an insensitive, even crass manner.

Take the example of the recent deaths of infants in Thar. While indeed every death cannot be blamed on the inefficiency of the administration, the manner in which senior Sindh government officials have reacted is cringe-worthy and completely devoid of compassion.

For example, Chief Minister Qaim Ali Shah has said the deaths have been “exaggerated” and that it was not possible for the government to know about every death in the desert. He added it was an “injustice” to hold the Sindh government responsible. And what about PPP MNA Imran Zafar Leghari’s reported comments questioning what the “big deal” was “if a few of them die” in hospital?

The words of Adviser to the Chief Minister on Information Maula Bux Chandio and Senior Minister Nisar Khuhro while visiting Mithi’s Civil Hospital were no less abhorrent.

The gentlemen said that Thari children were dying because of the “carelessness of mothers and underage marriage”, and that the government should not be blamed for the poor performance of the health department.

Over 60 children have reportedly died in Thar due to malnutrition and waterborne diseases since the beginning of January.

The children’s families have criticised the lack of medicine and other facilities at government health centres.

Yet, instead of empathising with the bereaved parents and promising to address the structural deficiencies that allow such tragedies to occur, Sindh’s rulers have reacted with brashness.

Governments elsewhere in Pakistan are also guilty of failing to deliver good governance. When confronted with criticism, elected representatives should admit their mistakes and promise to rectify them. In this case, criticism is termed a ‘conspiracy’ against democracy.

The fact is the biggest disservice to democracy is failing the people in whose name our leaders rule, and worse, brushing aside their miseries in such a callous manner.

Published in Dawn, January 18th, 2016

Opinion

In defamation’s name

In defamation’s name

It provides yet more proof that the undergirding logic of public authority in Pakistan is legal and extra-legal coercion rather than legitimised consent.

Editorial

Mercury rising
Updated 27 May, 2024

Mercury rising

Each of the country's leaders is equally responsible for the deep pit Pakistan seems to have fallen into.
Antibiotic overuse
27 May, 2024

Antibiotic overuse

ANTIMICROBIAL resistance is an escalating crisis claiming some 700,000 lives annually in Pakistan. It is the third...
World Cup team
27 May, 2024

World Cup team

PAKISTAN waited until the very end to name their T20 World Cup squad. Even then, there was last-minute drama. Four...
ICJ rebuke
Updated 26 May, 2024

ICJ rebuke

The reason for Israel’s criminal behaviour is that it is protected by its powerful Western friends.
Hot spells
26 May, 2024

Hot spells

WITH Pakistan already dealing with a heatwave that has affected 26 districts since May 21, word from the climate...
Defiant stance
26 May, 2024

Defiant stance

AT a time when the country is in talks with the IMF for a medium-term loan crucial to bolstering the fragile ...