ECP challenges high court’s order on delimitation

Published
0

ISLAMABAD: The Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) has challenged a judgment of the Lahore High Court’s Rawalpindi Bench, which set aside the delimitation of union councils of villages — such as Kotli Sattian and Murree — in the district Rawalpindi.

The appeal was instituted before the Supreme Court by ECP. On Oct 8, the court had declared the new delimitation of union councils null and void. These included areas such as Darnoin, Dheer Gran and Korina Kalan in Tehsil Kotli Sattian; Seribari, Dhall and Ghora Gali in Tehsil Murree, Hayyal Sharif and Banda Nagial etc.

The high court had held that the power to create or abolish a union council were outside the ECP’s jurisdiction and since the commission had exceeded its powers and jurisdiction, the process of delimitation in these villages must be carried out afresh. The high court had also asked ECP to announce a new election schedule for local government elections in these areas after reinitiating the process of delimitation.

Also read: Delimitation of union councils set aside

But on Nov 5, while deciding similar petitions, the Supreme Court had held that the authority to delimit the number of union councils and wards for the local government elections rested only with the ECP.


Petition filed in SC maintains that ECP is the only body competent to carry out delimitation


Filed through Advocate Muhammad Munir Paracha, the commission’s fresh appeal argues that a single judge of the high court had misinterpreted the provisions of the Punjab Local Government Act (PLGA) 2013 and wrongly recorded the finding that, despite a bar in Section 10-A of the PLGA, the high court had the jurisdiction to review or correct the delimitation of the union council.

Section 8(2) of PLGA provides that after demarcation of the local governments and determination of the union councils and wards, it is ECP which will delimit the union councils and wards, the petition maintained.

The appeal argued that the high court had failed to properly comprehend the scheme of the election prescribed by the law, since the only power vested with the government under section 7 was to determine the number of union councils in a metropolitan corporation, a municipal corporation, a district council and the wards of a municipal committee.

It is clear that the government can only determine the number of union councils, but delimitation is to be carried out by ECP, therefore the verdict of the high court is based on a misunderstanding of the PLGA scheme, the appeal argued.

Published in Dawn, November 24th, 2015

Opinion

Editorial

No talks
Updated 17 Oct, 2026

No talks

The government should understand that the PTI’s protest march and its reaction to it will look like nothing more than a storm in a teacup.
Strengthening LGs
17 Oct, 2026

Strengthening LGs

THE ECP has done well to refuse to allow the Punjab administration to push the local government elections to April....
Lesser citizens
17 Oct, 2026

Lesser citizens

FOR decades, discrimination and prejudice have narrowed the space for the country’s minority communities. The HRCP...
Deadly classrooms
Updated 16 Oct, 2026

Deadly classrooms

Parents should not have to become structural engineers to judge whether their children are safe at school.
Diplomatic options
Updated 16 Oct, 2026

Diplomatic options

Regional states know that the alternative to talks — a fully fledged war on both fronts — will bring immeasurable destruction to the Gulf, the Red Sea and the surrounding areas.
Hunger in Pakistan
16 Oct, 2026

Hunger in Pakistan

PAKISTAN’S position as the country most affected by hunger in South Asia is not surprising. An economy battered by...