Cross-border attack

Published October 29, 2015

THE killing of seven Frontier Corps personnel near the border with Afghanistan in South Waziristan is a grim reminder of the tensions in the region that, if not managed carefully, can explode.

Thus far the incident does not appear to have forced a hardening of rhetoric by either side, and the Pakistan military has not contradicted speculation that the attack was the work of Afghan-based anti-Pakistan militants as opposed to Afghan border security forces.

That suggests an unwillingness to allow the overall Pak-Afghan relationship to deteriorate once again — something that should be welcomed cautiously.

While Afghanistan does allege that there are continuing occasional, small-scale incidents involving Pakistani fire into eastern Afghanistan and Pakistan does complain of problems with the Afghan border forces, the overall situation between the security forces — at least along the border — appears to be much more stable compared to the recent troubles.

Yet, border incidents are a manifestation of a much wider problem: Pak-Afghan ties themselves. After a tumultuous few months, the bilateral relationship appears to be stabilising once again — but for how long and whether this time genuine and sustained breakthroughs are possible is not known.

The fighting season in Afghanistan is nearing an end; US troops are committed to remaining into 2017; Mullah Mansour seems to have established his leadership; the insurgency is wider and deadlier than it was a year ago; Pakistan insists it is still committed to bringing the Taliban to the peace table; and the Afghan unity government is yet to demonstrate it can put aside internal struggles.

These factors indicate that the possibility of an early and meaningful resumption of dialogue between the Taliban and the Afghan government seems neither worse nor necessarily better than it was earlier.

To make the unlikely possible, however, the old rule still applies: Pakistan and Afghanistan must work on bilateral ties.

Perhaps because it appears that outside powers, particularly the US and China, remain keenly interested in peace, some positive developments may be possible after all.

Published in Dawn, October 29th, 2015

On a mobile phone? Get the Dawn Mobile App: Apple Store | Google Play

Opinion

Editorial

Price bombs
Updated 18 Jun, 2024

Price bombs

It just wants to take the easy route and enjoy the ride for however long it is in power.
Palestine’s plight
Updated 17 Jun, 2024

Palestine’s plight

While the faithful across the world are celebrating with their families, thousands of Palestinian children have either been orphaned, or themselves been killed by the Israeli aggressors.
Profiting off denied visas
17 Jun, 2024

Profiting off denied visas

IT is no secret that visa applications to the UK and Schengen countries come at a high cost. But recent published...
After the deluge
Updated 16 Jun, 2024

After the deluge

There was a lack of mental fortitude in the loss against India while against US, the team lost all control and displayed a lack of cohesion and synergy.
Fugue state
16 Jun, 2024

Fugue state

WITH its founder in jail these days, it seems nearly impossible to figure out what the PTI actually wants. On one...
Sindh budget
16 Jun, 2024

Sindh budget

SINDH’S Rs3.06tr budget for the upcoming financial year is a combination of populist interventions, attempts to...