ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Thursday admitted a petition for a regular hearing filed by the federal government against the suspension of the Kissan Relief Package.

Last week, the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) suspended the implementation of three components of the package worth Rs341 billion. The scheme was announced by Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif ahead of the local government elections.

Attorney General Salman Aslam appeared before the IHC division bench, comprising Justice Noorul Haq N. Qureshi and Justice Aamir Farooq. After a preliminary hearing, the bench issued a notice to the ECP and adjourned the hearing till October 13.

Mr Butt requested the bench to issue a stay order against the ECP’s decision of suspending the relief package. The bench, however, observed that the matter would be decided at the next hearing.

A written order issued by the bench said, “In our view, at this stage the grant of stay will create complications.

Therefore, we would like to hear this petition on the next date of hearing for which specific directions will be issued to the respondent (ECP) to come and argue to the main petition as well as the civil miscellaneous petition (regarding stay order).”

The petition stated that the aim of the package was not to influence voters in the elections. It claimed that the implementation of the Kissan Package only served an executive function of the federal government.

The petition explained that the package was to be implemented countrywide, including KP and Balochistan, where local elections had already been held.

It said the package was announced after consultations with farming communities and provincial governments. It added that the relief package did not belong to a single person or political party.

The petition said the ECP cannot prevent the federal government from fulfilling its legal and constitutional responsibilities The petitioner requested the court to suspend the impugned orders of the ECP.

Published in Dawn, October 9th, 2015

On a mobile phone? Get the Dawn Mobile App: Apple Store | Google Play

Opinion

In defamation’s name

In defamation’s name

It provides yet more proof that the undergirding logic of public authority in Pakistan is legal and extra-legal coercion rather than legitimised consent.

Editorial

Mercury rising
Updated 27 May, 2024

Mercury rising

Each of the country's leaders is equally responsible for the deep pit Pakistan seems to have fallen into.
Antibiotic overuse
27 May, 2024

Antibiotic overuse

ANTIMICROBIAL resistance is an escalating crisis claiming some 700,000 lives annually in Pakistan. It is the third...
World Cup team
27 May, 2024

World Cup team

PAKISTAN waited until the very end to name their T20 World Cup squad. Even then, there was last-minute drama. Four...
ICJ rebuke
Updated 26 May, 2024

ICJ rebuke

The reason for Israel’s criminal behaviour is that it is protected by its powerful Western friends.
Hot spells
26 May, 2024

Hot spells

WITH Pakistan already dealing with a heatwave that has affected 26 districts since May 21, word from the climate...
Defiant stance
26 May, 2024

Defiant stance

AT a time when the country is in talks with the IMF for a medium-term loan crucial to bolstering the fragile ...